Top-down modulation of unconscious 'automatic' processes: A gating framework

In classical theories of automaticity, automatic processes are usually thought to occur autonomously and independently of higher level top-down factors (e.g., Posner & Snyder, 1975). However, already Neumann (1984) pointed out that the cognitive system has to be configured in a certain way for automatic processes to occur. In extension of his work, I propose a gating framework to account for the influence of top-down factors such as attention, intention and task set on automatic processes such as masked response or semantic priming. It is assumed that task representations held in prefrontal cortex regulate the gain of neurons in visual and sematic association cortex thereby modulating the effects of unconsciously perceived masked stimuli on further ‘automatic’ information processing steps. In support of the postulated gating framework, recent studies demonstrated a top-down modulation of automatic processes. Behavioral and electrophysiological studies with the masked response priming and semantic priming paradigms show that masked priming effects crucially depend (i) on temporal attention to the masked prime, (ii) on intentions or action plans and (iii) on the task set active immediately before masked prime presentation. For instance, masked semantic priming was only observed when the preceding task set required the orientation to semantic word features, but not when it required orientation to perceptual word features. These results support the view that unconscious automatic processes are modulated by top-down factors. They are suggestive of a gating mechanism which orchestrates the conscious and unconscious information processing streams.

[1]  Ingrid Scharlau,et al.  Temporal processes in prime–mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[2]  G. Houghton,et al.  ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  Categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres: automatic in the left hemisphere, postlexical in the right hemisphere? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  W. Perrig,et al.  The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[6]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[7]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[8]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation , 1996, Science.

[9]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  G Houghton,et al.  Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  P. Michie,et al.  Modulation of Event-Related Potentials by Semantic Priming: Effects of Color-Cued Selective Attention , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  D Deacon,et al.  How automatically is meaning accessed: a review of the effects of attention on semantic processing. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[13]  B. Hommel Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[15]  Luis J. Fuentes,et al.  The Role of the Anterior Attention System in Semantic Processing of both Foveal and Parafoveal Words , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Repetition-priming Modulates Category-related Effects on Event-related Potentials: Further Evidence for Multiple Cortical Semantic Systems , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Cohen,et al.  Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. , 1992, Psychological review.

[18]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  R. Verleger,et al.  How the Self Controls Its Automatic Pilot when Processing Subliminal Information , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Damian,et al.  Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  T H Carr,et al.  Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[23]  F. Hamker The reentry hypothesis: the putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  T. Shallice,et al.  Task Switching : A PDP Model , 2001 .

[26]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[28]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Measuring the Relative Magnitude of Unconscious Influences , 1995, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Unconscious priming according to multiple S-R rules , 2007, Cognition.

[30]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[31]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  E. Schröger,et al.  Psychophysics beyond sensation : laws and invariants of human cognition , 2004 .

[34]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness , 2004 .

[35]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  M. Klinger,et al.  Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[39]  Derek Besner,et al.  Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .

[40]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation , 2000, Neuroreport.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[42]  O. Neumann,et al.  Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Odmar Neumann,et al.  Automatic Processing: A Review of Recent Findings and a Plea for an Old Theory , 1984 .

[44]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[45]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[46]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[47]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Top–Down Contingencies of Nonconscious Priming Revealed by Dual–Task Interference , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[48]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[49]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[50]  M. Kiefer The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[52]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[54]  G. Logan Automaticity and cognitive control. , 1989 .

[55]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[56]  P. Rabbit Human information processing , 1977, Nature.

[57]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[61]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Effects of temporal cueing on residual visual discrimination in blindsight , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[63]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.

[64]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[65]  E Hennighausen,et al.  Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[66]  O. Neumann Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception , 1990, Psychological research.

[67]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Parallels between Perception without Attention and Perception without Awareness , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[68]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures , 1996, Nature.

[69]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[70]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[71]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Parts Outweigh the Whole (Word) in Unconscious Analysis of Meaning , 2000, Psychological science.

[72]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation during Indirect Semantic Priming: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998, Brain and Language.

[73]  M. Velmans Is human information processing conscious? , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[74]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[76]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[77]  O. Neumann,et al.  Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. , 1999 .

[78]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Changes in connectivity profiles as a mechanism for strategic control over interfering subliminal information. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.