论文信息 - Improving human interaction in crowdsensing

Improving human interaction in crowdsensing

We consider game theoretic aspects of crowdsensing projects. Commencing by studying putting effort in and sharing rewards from public projects,we continue to emotion-influenced interrelations in human society, including negotiations as a kind of such influence. These topics are also highly relevant to many applications apart from crowdsensing.

Mathijs de Weerdt | Gleb Polevoy | M. D. Weerdt | Gleb Polevoy

[1] P. Carnevale,et al. Time Pressure and the Development of Integrative Agreements in Bilateral Negotiations , 1986 .

[2] Ron Siegel,et al. All-Pay Contests , 2009 .

[3] J. E. Fokker. Inducing Human Cooperation in Decentralized Networks , 2013 .

[4] H. Simon,et al. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[5] A. Rubinstein. Modeling Bounded Rationality , 1998 .

[6] V. Lesser,et al. Automated negotiation for complex multi-agent resource allocation , 2010 .

[7] Fan Ye,et al. Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8] A. Tversky,et al. Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[9] Nigel Howard,et al. Manifesto for a Theory of Drama and Irrational Choice , 1993 .

[10] Guoming Lai,et al. A Generic Framework for Automated Multi-attribute Negotiation , 2009 .

[11] Stojan Trajanovski,et al. Nash equilibria in shared effort games , 2014, AAMAS.

[12] Vasilis Syrgkanis,et al. Efficiency and the Redistribution of Welfare , 2011 .

[13] N. R. Jennings,et al. To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .