A Theory of School and Classroom Organization

This article describes a theory relating alterable elements of school and classroom organization to effects on student achievement. Four critical elements are proposed: quality of instruction, appropriate levels of instruction, incentive, and time (QAIT). Changes in each of these elements are held to be multiplicatively related to changes in student achievement, supporting a view that multiple elements may have to be addressed if innovative instructional methods are to produce substantial gains in student achievement. Research evidence on each of the four components is briefly reviewed, and the QAIT perspective is applied to a discussion of findings from two areas of research: individualized instruction and ability grouping.

[1]  James H. Block,et al.  1: Mastery Learning , 1976 .

[2]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Combining Cooperative Learning and Individualized Instruction: Effects on Student Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes, and Behaviors , 1984, The Elementary School Journal.

[3]  D. Pumroy,et al.  A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. , 1975, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  R. Slavin.  When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[5]  L. A. Hayes.  The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: a review. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Brian Rowan,et al.  Systems of Ability Grouping and the Stratification of Achievement in Elementary Schools. , 1983 .

[7]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher Praise: A Functional Analysis , 1981 .

[8]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Seatwork in First-Grade Classrooms , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[9]  V. Horak,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Research Findings on Individualized Instruction in Mathematics , 1981 .

[10]  Nancy L. Karweit,et al.  A reanalysis of the effect of quantity of schooling on achievement , 1976 .

[11]  Robert G. Silberman,et al.  Academic Achievement Declines Under Pass-Fail Grading. , 1971 .

[12]  B. Gholson,et al.  Effects of Type and Combination of Feedback upon Conceptual Learning by Children: Implications for Research in Academic Learning , 1979 .

[13]  R. Slavin.  Grouping for Instruction in the elementary School , 1987 .

[14]  J. Brophy.  Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[15]  Meeting Children's Reading Needs in the Middle Grades: A Preliminary Report , 1954, The Elementary School Journal.

[16]  Carolyn M. Evertson,et al.  An Experimental Study of Effective Teaching in First-Grade Reading Groups , 1979, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Restrictive Educational Settings: Exile or Haven? , 1982 .

[18]  J. Goodlad,et al.  The nongraded elementary school , 1959 .

[19]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of Individual Learning Expectations on Student Achievement. , 1979 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Imagery and sentence learning. , 1971 .

[21]  Mary Budd Rowe,et al.  Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables: Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control. , 1972 .

[22]  R. Slavin.  The Napa Evaluation of Madeline Hunter's ITIP: Lessons Learned , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[23]  H. Maddox,et al.  PERFORMANCE DECREMENT IN THE LECTURE , 1975 .

[24]  G T Dalis,et al.  The effect of precise objectives upon student achievement in health education. , 1970, The Journal of school health.

[25]  Jane A. Stallings,et al.  Program Implementation and Student Achievement in a Four-Year Madeline Hunter Follow-Through Project , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[26]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Instruction's the Thing Wherein to Catch the Mind That Falls Behind , 1987 .

[27]  Student characteristics, classroom processes, and student achievement. , 1978 .

[28]  R. Barth.  Home-based Reinforcement of School Behavior: A Review and Analysis , 1979 .

[29]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Tracking in Secondary Schools: A Contextual Perspective. , 1987 .

[30]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[31]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students , 1984 .

[32]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Component Building: A Strategy for Research-Based Instructional Improvement , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[33]  M. Goldberg.  The Effects of Ability Grouping. , 1968 .

[34]  H. Walberg,et al.  Learning as a Function of Time , 1980 .

[35]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Experiments Relating Teachers’ Use of Higher Cognitive Questions to Student Achievement , 1979 .

[36]  B. Bloom.  Human Characteristics and School Learning , 1979 .

[37]  I. D. Gregory.  A New Look at the Lecture Method. , 1975 .

[38]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  The Instructional Dimensions Study , 1980 .

[39]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. , 1977 .

[40]  Margaret B Row.  Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables, Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control: Part One--Wait-Time. , 1974 .

[41]  D. Redfield,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Teacher Questioning Behavior , 1981 .

[42]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of Whole Class, Ability Grouped, and Individualized Instruction on Mathematics Achievement , 1985 .