Terminological and ontological analysis of European directives: multilinguism in law

This paper describes the philosophy behind our tool called "Legal Taxonomy Syllabus", the analytical instruments it provides and some case studies. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus is an ontology based tool designed to annotate and recover multi-lingua legal information and build conceptual dictionaries. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus allows to build legal dictionaries in a bottom up fashion starting from the annotation of legal terms by legal terminological experts and to let legal ontology engineers refine the resulting taxonomies of concepts. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus and its analytical tools provide help to lawyers to study the peculiarities of European Union Directives concerning the polysemy of legal terms, and the terminological and conceptual misalignment. By means of two case studies we show how the Legal Taxonomy Syllabus can help the processes of drafting and translating of the Directives.

[1]  Emmanuel Giguet,et al.  Multilingual Lexical Database Generation from Parallel Texts in 20 European Languages with Endogenous Resources , 2006, ACL.

[2]  Daniel Oberle,et al.  Semantic management of middleware , 2006, DSM '04.

[3]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation , 2003, ICAIL.

[4]  André Tunc,et al.  Comparer les droits , 1995 .

[5]  S. Griffis.  EDITOR , 1997, Journal of Navigation.

[6]  Tomaz Erjavec,et al.  The JRC-Acquis: A Multilingual Aligned Parallel Corpus with 20+ Languages , 2006, LREC.

[7]  Sylvie Szulman,et al.  Merging of legal micro-ontologies from European directives , 2007, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[8]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  OPJK modeling methodology , 2005 .

[9]  Rodolfo Sacco.  Un point de vue italien , 1987 .

[10]  Barbara Pozzo,et al.  HARMONISATION OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW AND THE NEED OF CREATING A COMMON TERMINOLOGY , 2003 .

[11]  Michel Klein,et al.  Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[12]  Piercarlo Rossi,et al.  Terms and Conceps: Towards a syllabus for European Private Law , 2004 .

[13]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[14]  R VisserPepijn,et al.  A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems , 1998 .

[15]  Guido Boella,et al.  The next EUR-Lex: What should be done for the needs of lawyers belonging to different national legal systems? , 2005 .

[16]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems , 1998, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[17]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Semantic Precision and Recall for Ontology Alignment Evaluation , 2007, IJCAI.

[18]  Daniel Oberle.  Semantic Management of Middleware (Semantic Web and Beyond: Computing for Human Experience) , 2006 .