Immunohistochemical markers predicting long-term recurrence following clival and spinal chordoma resection: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE Chordomas are rare tumors from notochordal remnants and account for 1%-4% of all primary bone malignancies, often arising from the clivus and sacrum. Despite margin-negative resection and postoperative radiotherapy, chordomas often recur. Further, immunohistochemical (IHC) markers have not been assessed as predictive of chordoma recurrence. The authors aimed to identify the IHC markers that are predictive of postoperative long-term (≥ 1 year) chordoma recurrence by using trained multiple tree-based machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS The authors reviewed the records of patients who had undergone treatment for clival and spinal chordomas between January 2017 and June 2021 across the Mayo Clinic enterprise (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona). Demographics, type of treatment, histopathology, and other relevant clinical factors were abstracted from each patient record. Decision tree and random forest classifiers were trained and tested to predict long-term recurrence based on unseen data using an 80/20 split. RESULTS One hundred fifty-one patients diagnosed and treated for chordomas were identified: 58 chordomas of the clivus, 48 chordomas of the mobile spine, and 45 chordomas sacrococcygeal in origin. Patients diagnosed with cervical chordomas were the oldest among all groups (58 ± 14 years, p = 0.009). Most patients were male (n = 91, 60.3%) and White (n = 139, 92.1%). Most patients underwent resection with or without radiation therapy (n = 129, 85.4%). Subtotal resection followed by radiation therapy (n = 51, 33.8%) was the most common treatment modality, followed by gross-total resection then radiation therapy (n = 43, 28.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that S100 and pan-cytokeratin are more likely to predict the increase in the risk of postoperative recurrence (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.09-12.42, p= 0.03; and OR 3.74, 95% CI 0.05-2.21, p = 0.02, respectively). In the decision tree analysis, a clinical follow-up > 1897 days was found in 37% of encounters and a 90% chance of being classified for recurrence (accuracy = 77%). Random forest analysis (n = 500 trees) showed that patient age, type of surgical treatment, location of tumor, S100, pan-cytokeratin, and EMA are the factors predicting long-term recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The IHC and clinicopathological variables combined with tree-based ML tools successfully demonstrated a high capacity to identify recurrence patterns with an accuracy of 77%. S100, pan-cytokeratin, and EMA were the IHC drivers of recurrence. This shows the power of ML algorithms in analyzing and predicting outcomes of rare conditions of a small sample size.

[1]  Yumin Wang,et al.  The prognostic significance of different degrees of resection of skull base chordoma , 2022, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[2]  Xiao-hai Liu,et al.  Surgical Outcomes of Clival Chordoma Through Endoscopic Endonasal Approach: A Single-Center Experience , 2022, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[3]  S. Gui,et al.  Mid-term follow-up surgical results in 284 cases of clival chordomas: the risk factors for outcome and tumor recurrence , 2021, Neurosurgical Review.

[4]  M. Chovanec,et al.  Decision making on vestibular schwannoma treatment: predictions based on machine-learning analysis , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Parisa Rashidi,et al.  Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making , 2021, Frontiers in Digital Health.

[6]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Targeted Therapy for Chordoma: Key Molecular Signaling Pathways and the Role of Multimodal Therapy , 2021, Targeted Oncology.

[7]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Cervical chordomas: multicenter case series and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[8]  G. U. Ganegoda,et al.  Involvement of Machine Learning Tools in Healthcare Decision Making , 2021, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[9]  Pongsthorn Chanplakorn,et al.  Results following surgical resection of recurrent chordoma of the spine: experience in a single institution , 2020, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of chordomas in the United States , 2020, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[11]  Frauke Kreuter,et al.  Tree-based machine learning methods for survey research , 2019 .

[12]  Y. Suh,et al.  Chordomas: Histopathological Study in View of Anatomical Location , 2019, Journal of Korean medical science.

[13]  Q. Thio,et al.  Can Machine-learning Techniques Be Used for 5-year Survival Prediction of Patients With Chondrosarcoma? , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Stefano Nembrini,et al.  The revival of the Gini importance? , 2018, Bioinform..

[15]  M. Ellis,et al.  Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  T Smitha.,et al.  Classification Rules by Decision Tree for Disease Prediction , 2012 .

[17]  B. Nahed,et al.  Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  H. Cho,et al.  Immunohistochemical Comparison of Chordoma With Chondrosarcoma, Myxopapillary Ependymoma, and Chordoid Meningioma , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[19]  P. Mortini,et al.  Clival Chordomas: Management and Follow-Up Results in a Series of 29 Consecutive Patients , 2005 .

[20]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Jenifer R Prosperi Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer , 2017, Resistance to Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapeutics.

[22]  J. Sakuma,et al.  OUTCOME OF CLIVAL CHORDOMAS AFTER SKULL BASE SURGERIES WITH MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF 10 YEARS. , 2015, Fukushima journal of medical science.