Developmental Trajectory of Face Processing Revealed by Integrative Dynamics

Given their unique connectivity, a primary function of brain networks must be to transfer and integrate information. Therefore, the way in which information is integrated by individual nodes of the network may be an informative aspect of cognitive processing. Here we present a method inspired by telecommunications research that utilizes time–frequency fluctuations of neural activity to infer how information is integrated by individual nodes of the network. We use a queueing theoretical model to interpret empirical data in terms of information processing and integration. In particular, we demonstrate, in participants aged from 6 to 41 years, that the well-known face inversion phenomenon may be explained in terms of information integration. Our model suggests that inverted faces may be associated with shorter and more frequent neural integrative stages, indicating fractured processing and consistent with the notion that inverted faces are perceived by parts. Conversely, our model suggests that upright faces may be associated with a smaller number of sustained episodes of integration, indicating more involved processing, akin to holistic and configural processing. These differences in how upright and inverted faces are processed became more pronounced during development, indicating a gradual specialization for face perception. These effects were robustly expressed in the right fusiform gyrus (all groups), as well as right parahippocampal gyrus (children and adolescents only) and left inferior temporal cortex (adults only).

[1]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[3]  Takashi Tsukiura,et al.  Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face–name associations: The rewarding power of a smile , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  C. Grady,et al.  The modulation of BOLD variability between cognitive states varies by age and processing speed. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[6]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face Recognition Memory and Configural Processing: A Developmental ERP Study using Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reversed Faces , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[9]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[11]  J. Giedd,et al.  Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[14]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Empirical and Theoretical Aspects of Generation and Transfer of Information in a Neuromagnetic Source Network , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[15]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face processing in adolescents with and without epilepsy. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[17]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[19]  C. Grady,et al.  Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signal Variability Is More than Just Noise , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Kathleen M. Thomas,et al.  Neural Bases of Cognitive Development , 2007 .

[21]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[22]  T. Gasser,et al.  Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  M. Breakspear,et al.  Bistability and Non-Gaussian Fluctuations in Spontaneous Cortical Activity , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[29]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[30]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  N. Smirnov Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[32]  B. Kolb,et al.  Developmental changes in the recognition and comprehension of facial expression: Implications for frontal lobe function , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Mathieu Gallay,et al.  The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  Vasily A. Vakorin,et al.  Variability of Brain Signals Processed Locally Transforms into Higher Connectivity with Brain Development , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Functional Embedding Predicts the Variability of Neural Activity , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[37]  H. Riedwyl Goodness of Fit , 1967 .

[38]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The hippocampal region is involved in successful recognition of both remote and recent famous faces , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Flavio M. de Paula,et al.  Developmental differences in the neural bases of the face inversion effect show progressive tuning of face-selective regions to the upright orientation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space , 2009, Cognition.

[42]  Y Liu,et al.  Queueing network modeling of elementary mental processes. , 1996, Psychological review.

[43]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[44]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[46]  A. Freire,et al.  Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Brain noise is task dependent and region specific. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. , 1999, Science.

[49]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[50]  O. Sporns,et al.  White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Learning face-name associations and the effect of age and performance: a PET activation study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[53]  D. Mathalon,et al.  Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia. , 2008, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[54]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least squares. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Jane E Joseph,et al.  Neural developmental changes in processing inverted faces , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[57]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[58]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[59]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Daniel L Schacter,et al.  Evidence for a specific role of the anterior hippocampal region in successful associative encoding , 2007, Hippocampus.

[61]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Putting names to faces: Successful encoding of associative memories activates the anterior hippocampal formation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[62]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[63]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[64]  E. Pang,et al.  Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation , 2011, Brain Research.

[65]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Multivariate statistical analyses for neuroimaging data. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Discrimination of Facial Features by Adults, 10-Year-Olds, and Cataract-Reversal Patients , 2010, Perception.

[67]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[68]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Processes and Lateralized Task Control in the Human Brain , 2003, Science.

[70]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Increased Brain Signal Variability Accompanies Lower Behavioral Variability in Development , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[72]  C. Grady,et al.  The Importance of Being Variable , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  James T. Enns,et al.  What Can Be Learned about Attention from Studying Its Development , 1993 .

[74]  C. Stam,et al.  Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[75]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  A Canonical Model of Multistability and Scale-Invariance in Biological Systems , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[76]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[78]  M P Young,et al.  Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[79]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  The Faces of Development: A Review of Early Face Processing over Childhood , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[81]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[82]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[83]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[84]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Extracting Message Inter-Departure Time Distributions from the Human Electroencephalogram , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[85]  John S. Duncan,et al.  Material-specific lateralization of memory encoding in the medial temporal lobe: Blocked versus event-related design , 2005, NeuroImage.

[86]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[87]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  The Development of Face Recognition; Hippocampal and Frontal Lobe Contributions Determined with MEG , 2011, Brain Topography.

[88]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  Event-related beamforming: A robust method for presurgical functional mapping using MEG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[89]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[90]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG , 2006, Brain Research.

[91]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[92]  C. Eckart,et al.  The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank , 1936 .

[93]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[94]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .