The impact of energy performance certificates: A survey of German home owners

The building sector accounts for about 40% of the final energy consumption in Germany. At the same time, the sector is regarded as one of the most cost-effective options for saving CO2 emissions. To target this potential, the European Union introduced energy performance certificates (EPC). EPCs should provide clear information about the energy performance of buildings to building purchasers, owners and tenants. This study analyses, in how far EPCs have helped purchasers of owner-occupied dwellings in Germany to incorporate energy efficiency in their purchasing decisions. The results suggest that the effectiveness of EPCs is limited. Main reasons are first, that the certificates are not helpful for understanding the financial implications of energy efficiency. Second, EPCs are not viewed for most buildings due to their legal status. Third, energy efficiency is only a minor purchasing criterion for dwelling purchases. The results of the study however also point to the potential of EPCs, as these barriers can be removed. From 2013 onwards the use of the EPC will be increased due to the new EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Changes to the design of the EPC could further increase the importance of energy performance certificates and of energy efficiency.

[1]  Barry D. Solomon,et al.  Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs , 2003 .

[2]  W.M.C. Beerepoot,et al.  Energy policy instruments and technical change in the residential building sector , 2007 .

[3]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  Labeling design effort for household refrigerator-freezers in Malaysia , 2005 .

[4]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instruments , 2008 .

[5]  Edward Vine,et al.  Energy savings certificates: A market-based tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions , 2008 .

[6]  Andreas Weglage.  Energieausweis - Das große Kompendium , 2007 .

[7]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Alleviating asymmetric information in property markets: building performance and product quality as signals for consumers , 2005 .

[8]  S. Jamieson.  Likert scales: how to (ab)use them , 2004, Medical education.

[9]  R. Howarth,et al.  ‘Normal’ markets, market imperfections and energy efficiency , 1994 .

[10]  Richa Kapoor,et al.  Energy saving instrument - ESCerts in India , 2012 .

[11]  J. Peter Clinch,et al.  Domestic energy efficiency in ireland: correcting market failure , 2000 .

[12]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Energy-efficiency labels and standards: A guidebook for appliances, equipment and lighting , 2001 .

[13]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  From theory based policy evaluation to SMART policy design: Lessons learned from 20 ex-post evaluations fo energy efficiency instruments , 2007 .

[14]  Kim Bjarne Wittchen,et al.  Development of a 2nd generation energycertificate scheme - Danish experience , 2007 .

[15]  K. Gillingham,et al.  ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES: A Retrospective Examination , 2006 .

[16]  Aliz McLean,et al.  How Does an Increase in Energy Efficiency Affect Housing Prices? A Case Study of a Renovation , 2013 .

[17]  Sean Lyons,et al.  The Value of Domestic Building Energy Efficiency – Evidence from Ireland , 2012 .

[18]  W. D. Silva,et al.  SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY , 2012 .

[19]  C. Russell,et al.  Environment, information and consumer behaviour , 2005 .