Factor analysis for El Niño signals in sea surface temperature and precipitation

Maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) is applied to investigate the variables of monthly Tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures (SST) from Niño 1+2, Niño 3, Niño 3.4, and Niño 4 and precipitation over New South Wales and Queensland of eastern Australia, Kalimantan Island of Indonesia, and California and Oregon of the west coast of the United States. The monthly data used were from 1950 to 1999. The November-February SST with time leads of 0, 1, 2, and 3 months to precipitation are considered for both El Niño warm phases and non El Niño seasons. Interpretations of the factor loadings are made to diagnose relationships between the SST and precipitation variables. For El Niño signals, the rotated FA loadings can efficiently group the SST and precipitation variables with interpretable physical meanings. When the time lag is 0 or 1 month, the November–February El Niño SST explains much of the drought signals over eastern Australia and Kalimantan. However, when the time lag is 2 or 3 months, the same SST cannot adequately explain the precipitation during January–May over the two regions. Communality results of five factors for precipitation indicate nearly 100% explanation of variances for Queensland and California, but the percentages are reduced to only about 30% for Oregon and Kalimantan. Factor scores clearly identify the strongest El Niño relevant to precipitation variations. Principal component factor analysis (PCFA) is also investigated, and its results are compared with MLFA. The comparison indicates that MLFA can better group SST data relevant to precipitation. The residuals of MLFA are always smaller than the PCFA. Thus, MLFA may become a useful tool for improving potential predictability of precipitation from SST predictors.

[1]  J. Ruffner.  Climates of the States: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration narrative summaries, tables, and maps for each State, with overview of state climatologist programs [USA] , 1980 .

[2]  Y. Dinpashoh,et al.  Selection of variables for the purpose of regionalization of Iran's precipitation climate using multivariate methods , 2004 .

[3]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Sampling Errors in the Estimation of Empirical Orthogonal Functions , 1982 .

[4]  T. Barnett,et al.  Origins and Levels of Monthly and Seasonal Forecast Skill for United States Surface Air Temperatures Determined by Canonical Correlation Analysis , 1987 .

[5]  W. Walters.  Climate indices for use in social and behavioral research. , 1999, IASSIST quarterly.

[6]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[7]  kwang-yul kim,et al.  Detection of Forced Climate Signals. Part 1: Filter Theory , 1995 .

[8]  A. Robertson,et al.  A role for tropical tropospheric temperature adjustment to El Niño–Southern Oscillation in the seasonality of monsoonal Indonesia precipitation predictability , 2007 .

[9]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[10]  M. Haylock,et al.  Spatial Coherence and Predictability of Indonesian Wet Season Rainfall , 2001 .

[11]  D. Metaxas,et al.  Factor Analysis of some climatological elements in Athens, 1931–1992: covariability and climatic change , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Specification and Prediction of Global Surface Temperature and Precipitation from Global SST Using CCA , 1996 .

[13]  Kyu-Myong Kim,et al.  Potential predictability of seasonal precipitation over the United States from canonical ensemble correlation predictions , 2002 .

[14]  R. Darlington,et al.  Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  An Improved Method for Analyzing Sparse and Irregularly Distributed SST Data on a Regular Grid: The Tropical Pacific Ocean , 1998 .

[16]  R. DWI SUSANTOb,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF THREE DOMINANT RAINFALL REGIONS WITHIN INDONESIA AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE , 2003 .

[17]  W. Lau,et al.  A Canonical Ensemble Correlation Prediction Model for Seasonal Precipitation Anomaly , 2001 .