AEN-PRO: Agent-based simulation tool for performance and working conditions assessment in production systems using workers’ margins of manoeuver

Abstract During the last eighty years, new work philosophies has been introduced and technological advancement changed radically the way of work, making it more reactive, agile but complex as well. As a result, classical approaches for production system design may no longer be sufficient to ensure productivity and safety of industrial systems. In the domain of occupational diseases, adopting a pure biomechanical approach, consisting in ensuring the non-violation of workers’ biomechanical limits at each workstation is proved to be uncomplete. Beside biomechanical risk factors, psychosocial risk factors, which are strongly linked to the dynamic of the physical and informational flows, may contribute to the genesis of Musculoskeletal Disorders. By granting a certain workers’ margins of manoeuver, these risk factors can be limited. This article introduces AEN-PRO, a simulation tool for investigating the impact of physical flow on the production system and particularly workers, to assess their margins of manoeuver and to ensure safer and productive systems.

[1]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Research to practice: Effectiveness of controlled workplace interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorders in the manufacturing environment—critical appraisal and meta-analysis , 2008 .

[2]  Anil Mital,et al.  The validity of predetermined motion time systems in setting production standards for industrial tasks , 1989 .

[3]  Jeffrey S. Smith,et al.  Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: Literature review and analysis , 2014 .

[4]  Maurice Bonney,et al.  A comparative study of learning curves with forgetting , 1997 .

[5]  W.P. Neumann,et al.  Integrating human factors into discrete event simulations of parallel flow strategies , 2009 .

[6]  B Kirwan,et al.  The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques - THERP, HEART and JHEDI: part 1 - technique descriptions and validation issues. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  P. Loisel,et al.  Relationship between the margin of manoeuvre and the return to work after a long-term absence due to a musculoskeletal disorder: an exploratory study , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  Incorporating human fatigue and recovery into the learning–forgetting process , 2013 .

[9]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  Modelling worker reliability with learning and fatigue , 2015 .

[10]  Tim Bosch,et al.  Discrete event simulation as an ergonomic tool to predict workload exposures during systems design , 2014 .

[11]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.