The seismic response of single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems incorporating flag‐shaped hysteretic structural behaviour, with self‐centring capability, is investigated numerically. For a SDOF system with a given initial period and strength level, the flag‐shaped hysteretic behaviour is fully defined by a post‐yielding stiffness parameter and an energy‐dissipation parameter. A comprehensive parametric study was conducted to determine the influence of these parameters on SDOF structural response, in terms of displacement ductility, absolute acceleration and absorbed energy. This parametric study was conducted using an ensemble of 20 historical earthquake records corresponding to ordinary ground motions having a probability of exceedence of 10% in 50 years, in California. The responses of the flag‐shaped hysteretic SDOF systems are compared against the responses of similar bilinear elasto‐plastic hysteretic SDOF systems. In this study the elasto‐plastic hysteretic SDOF systems are assigned parameters representative of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) with post‐Northridge welded beam‐to‐column connections. In turn, the flag‐shaped hysteretic SDOF systems are representative of steel MRFs with newly proposed post‐tensioned energy‐dissipating connections. Building structures with initial periods ranging from 0.1 to 2.0s and having various strength levels are considered. It is shown that a flag‐shaped hysteretic SDOF system of equal or lesser strength can always be found to match or better the response of an elasto‐plastic hysteretic SDOF system in terms of displacement ductility and without incurring any residual drift from the seismic event. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[1]
J. P. Moehle,et al.
Displacement-Based Design of RC Structures Subjected to Earthquakes
,
1992
.
[2]
Nigel Priestley.
Seismic Design Philosophy for Precast Concrete Frames
,
1996
.
[3]
Mjn Priestley.
Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings
,
1996
.
[4]
G. MacRae,et al.
POST‐EARTHQUAKE RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENTS OF BILINEAR OSCILLATORS
,
1997
.
[5]
John F. Stanton,et al.
A HYBRID REINFORCED PRECAST FRAME FOR SEISMIC REGIONS
,
1997
.
[6]
W. J. Hall,et al.
Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings
,
2001
.
[7]
Robert Tremblay,et al.
Performance Evaluation of Friction Spring Seismic Damper
,
2000
.
[8]
Richard Sause,et al.
Posttensioned Seismic-Resistant Connections for Steel Frames
,
2001
.