Thermal behaviour of coal/biomass blends during co-pyrolysis

Abstract Investigations into the thermal behaviour during co-pyrolysis of coal, biomass materials and coal/biomass blends prepared at different ratios (10:90, 20:80, 30:70 and 50:50) have been conducted using a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) apparatus. Coal sample selected was Collie subbituminous coal from Western Australia, while wood waste (WW) and wheat straw (WS) were used as biomass samples. Three thermal events were identified during the pyrolysis. The first two were dominated by the biomass pyrolysis, while the third was linked to the coal pyrolysis, which occurred at much higher temperatures. No interactions were seen between the coal and biomass during co-pyrolysis. The pyrolytic characteristics of the blends followed those of the parent fuels in an additive manner. Among the tested blends, 20:80 blends showed the lowest activation energies of 90.9 and 78.7 kJ mol −1 for coal/WW and coal/WS blends, respectively. It was also found that the optimum blend ratio for pyrolysis of coal/WS to be 50:50 with a high degradation rate in all thermal events and a higher mass loss over the course of the co-pyrolysis compared to coal/WW blends examined. The reaction orders in these experiments were found to be in the range of 0.21–1.60, thus having a significant effect on the overall reaction rate. Besides the pyrolysis of coal alone, the 50:50 coal/biomass blends had the highest reaction rate, ranging from 1×10 9 to 2×10 9 min −1 .

[1]  F. C. Lockwood,et al.  The influence of burner injection mode on pulverized coal and biomass co-fired flames , 1994 .

[2]  Anthony V. Bridgwater,et al.  Research in thermochemical biomass conversion. , 1988 .

[3]  J. A. Conesa,et al.  Thermogravimetric analysis of olive stones with sulphuric acid treatment , 1997 .

[4]  C. Koufopanos,et al.  Kinetic modelling of the pyrolysis of biomass and biomass components , 1989 .

[5]  L. Helsen,et al.  Kinetics of the low-temperature pyrolysis of chromated copper arsenate treated wood , 2000 .

[6]  D. Klass Energy from Biomass and Wastes , 1984, Bio/Technology.

[7]  T. Heinzel,et al.  Investigation of slagging in pulverized fuel co-combustion of biomass and coal at a pilot-scale test facility , 1998 .

[8]  M. Ramiah,et al.  Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin , 1970 .

[9]  Kinetics of Biomass Pyrolysis with Radiant Heating , 1988 .

[10]  Rafael Kandiyoti,et al.  Secondary reactions of flash pyrolysis tars measured in a fluidized bed pyrolysis reactor with some novel design features , 1989 .

[11]  畠山 立子,et al.  Thermal Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications to Polymer Science , 1994 .

[12]  Mohamed Pourkashanian,et al.  Combustion of pulverised coal and biomass , 2001 .

[13]  Kim Dam-Johansen,et al.  Full-scale co-firing of straw and coal , 1996 .

[14]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Pyrolysis of blends of biomass with poor coals , 1996 .

[15]  Chatphol Meesri,et al.  Lack of synergetic effects in the pyrolytic characteristics of woody biomass/coal blends under low and high heating rate regimes , 2002 .

[16]  Panagiotis Grammelis,et al.  Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of lignite–biomass blends during devolatilization , 2002 .

[17]  W. Wendlandt Thermal methods of analysis , 1964 .

[18]  K. Mansaray,et al.  Determination of Reaction Kinetics of Rice Husks in Air Using Thermogravimetric Analysis , 1999 .

[19]  J. Werther,et al.  Combustion of agricultural residues , 2000 .