BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) project developed and implemented innovations to medical school curricula at medical schools across the country. This report describes the development and implementation of innovative approaches to improving instruction in evidence-based medicine with a population-based perspective.
METHODS
Each school participating in the UME-21 project designed, implemented, and evaluated its own unique curriculum initiatives. We examined these initiatives using data abstracted from written reports submitted to the project Executive Committee. Additional data were obtained by personal communication with project directors and evaluators at the various schools, student and preceptor comments, internal program evaluation at each school, and external evaluation by the UME-21 project leadership. The Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire was also used.
RESULTS
Fourteen of 18 participating schools implemented a broad range of curricula to facilitate teaching and learning about evidence-based and population-based medicine. Common themes included the application of evidence to patient care, use of clinical practice guidelines and pathways, and the general incorporation of evidence-based techniques (literature searching, critical appraisal, etc) into the teaching of other content, such as clinical science and managed care. Teaching approaches included Web-based and other computer-based education, an emphasis on active and self-directed learning, use of small groups and workshops, and distribution of this content over multiple years. As an alternative to full-length evidence-based medicine courses, many schools incorporated an evidence-based approach into existing courses and clerkships. Data demonstrated an upward trend in student satisfaction with how topics were presented at UME-21 schools.
CONCLUSIONS
These innovations successfully demonstrated that evidence-based and population-based medicine content can be introduced into medical school curricula. Introducing these constructs in ways that demonstrate their relevance to patient care facilitates student learning.
[1]
Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.
Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?
,
2002,
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[2]
D. Sackett,et al.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
,
1996,
BMJ.
[3]
P C Wyer.
The critically appraised topic: closing the evidence-transfer gap.
,
1997,
Annals of emergency medicine.
[4]
Mary Y. Lee,et al.
A Synthesis of Nine Major Reports on Physicians' Competencies for the Emerging Practice Environment
,
2001,
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[5]
G R Norman,et al.
Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal.
,
1998,
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[6]
Gordon Guyatt,et al.
Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine.
,
2002,
JAMA.
[7]
A T Evans,et al.
Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability.
,
2000,
Journal of general internal medicine.
[8]
Howard K. Rabinowitz,et al.
Innovative Approaches to Educating Medical Students for Practice in a Changing Health Care Environment: The National UME‐21 Project
,
2001,
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.