Validation of a spatially variant resolution model for small animal brain PET studies

In small animal positron emission tomography (PET) studies, given the spatial resolution of preclinical PET scanners, quantification in small regions can be challenging. Moreover, in scans where animals are placed away from the center of the field of view (CFOV), e.g. in simultaneous scans of multiple animals, quantification accuracy can be compromised due to the loss of spatial resolution towards the edge of the FOV. Here, we implemented a spatially variant resolution model to improve quantification in small regions and to allow simultaneous scanning of multiple animals without compromising quantification accuracy. The scanner's point spread function (PSF) was characterized across the FOV and modelled using a spatially variant and asymmetric Gaussian function. The spatially variant PSF (SVPSF) was then used for resolution modelling in the iterative reconstruction. To assess the image quality, a line source phantom in a cold and warm background, as well as mouse brain [18F]FDG scans, were performed. The SVPSF and the vendor's maximum a posteriori (MAP3D) reconstructions produced uniform spatial resolution across the scanner FOV, but MAP3D resulted in lower spatial resolution. The line sources recovery coefficient using SVPSF was similar at the CFOV and at the edge of the FOV. In contrast, the other tested reconstructions produced lower recovery coefficient at the edge of the FOV. In mouse brain reconstructions, less spill-over from hot regions to cold regions, as well as more symmetric regional brain uptake was observed using SVPSF. The contrast in brain images was the highest using SVPSF, in mice scanned at the CFOV and off-center. Incorporation of a spatially variant resolution model for small animal brain PET improves quantification accuracy in small regions and produces consistent image spatial resolution across the FOV. Therefore, simultaneous scanning of multiple animals can benefit by using spatially variant resolution modelling.

[1]  M Defrise,et al.  Non-Gaussian space-variant resolution modelling for list-mode reconstruction , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Long Zhang,et al.  Fast and memory-efficient Monte Carlo-based image reconstruction for whole-body PET. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Daniela D'Ambrosio,et al.  Pixel-based partial volume correction of small animal PET images using Point Spread Function system characterization: Evaluation of effects on cardiac output, perfusion and metabolic rate using parametric images , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  Single scan parameterization of space-variant point spread functions in image space via a printed array: the impact for two PET/CT scanners , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: Theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Spatially Variant Resolution Modelling for Iterative List-Mode PET Reconstruction , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[12]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  High throughput static and dynamic small animal imaging using clinical PET/CT: potential preclinical applications , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  Michael E Casey,et al.  Generalized PSF modeling for optimized quantitation in PET imaging , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  K Thielemans,et al.  Image-based point spread function implementation in a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm for PET , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Pragmatic fully 3D image reconstruction for the MiCES mouse imaging PET scanner. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Holen,et al.  Performance evaluation of small-animal multipinhole μSPECT scanners for mouse imaging , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.