Natural Logic and Natural Language Inference

We propose a model of natural language inference which identifies valid inferences by their lexical and syntactic features, without full semantic interpretation. We extend past work in natural logic, which has focused on semantic containment and monotonicity, by incorporating both semantic exclusion and implicativity. Our model decomposes an inference problem into a sequence of atomic edits linking premise to hypothesis; predicts a lexical entailment relation for each edit; propagates these relations upward through a semantic composition tree according to properties of intermediate nodes; and joins the resulting entailment relations across the edit sequence. A computational implementation of the model achieves 70 % accuracy and 89 % precision on the FraCaS test suite. Moreover, including this model as a component in an existing system yields significant performance gains on the Recognizing Textual Entailment challenge.

[1]  Ido Dagan,et al.  The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge , 2007, ACL-PASCAL@ACL.

[2]  Johan Bos,et al.  Recognising Textual Entailment with Logical Inference , 2005, HLT.

[3]  G. Lakoff Linguistics and natural logic , 1970, Synthese.

[4]  Stephen Pulman,et al.  Using the Framework , 1996 .

[5]  J. Benthem A brief history of natural logic , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Entailment, intensionality and text understanding , 2003, HLT-NAACL 2003.

[7]  Doug Downey,et al.  It’s a Contradiction – no, it’s not: A Case Study using Functional Relations , 2008, EMNLP.

[8]  Ido Dagan,et al.  Web Based Probabilistic Textual Entailment , 2005 .

[9]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  A Phrase-Based Alignment Model for Natural Language Inference , 2008, EMNLP.

[10]  Michael Böttner,et al.  A note on existential import , 1988, Stud Logica.

[11]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  The 2005 PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge , 2005, MLCW.

[12]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  The semantics of variety in categorial grammar , 1988 .

[13]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Natural language inference , 2009 .

[14]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2005 .

[15]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[16]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic , 1997 .

[17]  Victor Manual Sánchez Valencia,et al.  Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar , 1991 .

[18]  Eric Yeh,et al.  Learning Alignments and Leveraging Natural Logic , 2007, ACL-PASCAL@ACL.

[19]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Modeling Semantic Containment and Exclusion in Natural Language Inference , 2008, COLING.

[20]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments , 2006, NAACL.

[21]  Jan van Eijck,et al.  Natural Logic for Natural Language , 2007, TbiLLC.

[22]  C. Condoravdi,et al.  Computing relative polarity for textual inference , 2006 .