A simple and effective method based on strain projections to alleviate locking in isogeometric solid shells

In this work, we focus on the family of shell formulations referred to as “solid shells”, where the simulation of shell-type structures is performed by means of a mesh of 3D solid elements, with typically only one element through the thickness. We propose a novel approach for alleviating shear and membrane locking phenomena, which typically appear in thin structures, based on the projection of strains onto discontinuous coarser polynomial spaces defined at element level. In particular, we present and investigate two different formulations based on this approach. Several numerical experiments prove the very good performance of both formulations in terms of displacements and stresses. The main advantages of the presented approach compared to existing solid shell formulations are its simplicity and numerical efficiency.

[1]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF 'SOLID-SHELL' ELEMENT FORMULATIONS FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR ANALYSES EMPLOYING ONLY DISPLACEMENT DEGREES OF FREEDOM , 1998 .

[2]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  An improved EAS brick element for finite deformation , 2010 .

[3]  G. Garcea,et al.  An efficient isogeometric solid-shell formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of elastic shells , 2018 .

[4]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Blended isogeometric shells , 2013 .

[5]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  T. Hughes,et al.  Finite Elements Based Upon Mindlin Plate Theory With Particular Reference to the Four-Node Bilinear Isoparametric Element , 1981 .

[7]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  An isogeometric continuum shell element for non-linear analysis , 2014 .

[8]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Assumed Natural Strain NURBS-based solid-shell element for the analysis of large deformation elasto-plastic thin-shell structures , 2015 .

[9]  J. F. Caseiro,et al.  On the Assumed Natural Strain method to alleviate locking in solid-shell NURBS-based finite elements , 2014 .

[10]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  A new volumetric and shear locking‐free 3D enhanced strain element , 2003 .

[11]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  An isogeometric solid‐like shell element for nonlinear analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Michael C. H. Wu,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials , 2015 .

[13]  A. Combescure,et al.  Efficient isogeometric NURBS-based solid-shell elements: Mixed formulation and B-method , 2013 .

[14]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  An enhanced strain 3D element for large deformation elastoplastic thin-shell applications , 2004 .

[15]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Stress projection for membrane and shear locking in shell finite elements , 1985 .

[16]  Jeong Whan Yoon,et al.  Enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and assumed natural strain (ANS) methods for one‐point quadrature solid‐shell elements , 2008 .

[17]  K. Y. Sze,et al.  A hybrid stress ANS solid-shell element and its generalization for smart structure modelling. Part II?smart structure modelling , 2000 .

[18]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  A simplified Kirchhoff–Love large deformation model for elastic shells and its effective isogeometric formulation , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[19]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell , 2011 .

[20]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  A shear deformable, rotation-free isogeometric shell formulation , 2016 .

[21]  E. Ramm,et al.  Large elasto-plastic finite element analysis of solids and shells with the enhanced assumed strain concept , 1996 .

[22]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements , 2009 .

[23]  K. S. Lo,et al.  Computer analysis in cylindrical shells , 1964 .

[24]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  A reduced integration solid‐shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept—Large deformation problems , 2011 .

[25]  K. Y. Sze,et al.  A hybrid stress ANS solid‐shell element and its generalization for smart structure modelling. Part I—solid‐shell element formulation , 2000 .

[26]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[27]  Thomas J. R. Hughes Isogeometric Analysis : Progress and Challenges , 2008 .

[28]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Hierarchic isogeometric large rotation shell elements including linearized transverse shear parametrization , 2017 .

[29]  K. Bathe,et al.  A continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis , 1984 .

[30]  Hung Nguyen-Xuan,et al.  Static, free vibration, and buckling analysis of laminated composite Reissner–Mindlin plates using NURBS‐based isogeometric approach , 2012 .

[31]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[32]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[33]  R. Echter,et al.  A hierarchic family of isogeometric shell finite elements , 2013 .

[34]  Josef Kiendl,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulation for elasto-plasticity , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.