A stage model of knowledge management: an empirical investigation of process and effectiveness

Knowledge management (KM) is now widely recognized to be important to the success or failure of business management. Seeking to better understand the determinants of the evolution of KM, this study focuses on two main problems: (1) whether firms change their KM processes over time to improve KM effectiveness as well as develop their KM practices, and (2) whether socio-technical support results in more mature KM practices. This study draws on the previous literature to identify key dimensions of KM process (knowledge acquisition, knowledge conversion, knowledge application and knowledge protection), KM effectiveness (individual-level and organizational-level KM effectiveness) and socio-technical support (organizational support and information technology diffusion). The evolution of these dimensions is studied in the form of a stage model of KM that includes initiation, development, and mature stages. Data gathered from 141 senior executives in large Taiwanese organizations were employed to test the propositions. The results show that different stages of KM evolution can be distinguished across dimensions of KM process, KM effectiveness, and socio-technical support. Implications for organizations are also discussed.

[1]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[2]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[3]  Roland R. Nyns A case against Alan Hirvela's case against CAI , 1990 .

[4]  Chung-Jen Chen The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2004 .

[5]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[6]  Chinho Lin,et al.  TQM critical factors and KM value chain activities , 2006 .

[7]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[8]  D. Griffith,et al.  The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Dynamism on Knowledge Management Capabilities of Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries , 2005 .

[9]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  Impact of social capital and business operation mode on intellectual capital and knowledge management , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Salleh Yahya,et al.  Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  A model for Web adoption , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e‐business adoption , 2005 .

[13]  A. Jantunen Knowledge‐processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study , 2005 .

[14]  Xuan Guo-liang,et al.  Knowledge Value Chain , 2006 .

[15]  Ros Jones,et al.  Measuring the benefits of knowledge management at the Financial Services Authority: a case study , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[16]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[17]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Petter Gottschalk Expert systems at stage IV of the knowledge management technology stage model: The case of police investigations , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Petter Gottschalk Predictors of IT support for knowledge management in the professions: an empirical study of law firms in Norway , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Knowledge management technologies and applications - literature review from 1995 to 2002 , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[25]  Tzu-Chuan Chou,et al.  Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Y. Jarrar Knowledge management: learning for organisational experience , 2002 .

[27]  M. Crossan The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[28]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  An exploratory study of groupware use in the knowledge management process , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Ranjit Bose Knowledge Management Capabilities & Infrastructure for E-Commerce , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[30]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[31]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical study: Special Topic Section on Knowledge Management in Asia , 2005 .

[32]  Journal of Information Science , 1984 .

[33]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[34]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[35]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[36]  Abdelkader Daghfous,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and the Implementation of Knowledge-Intensive Best Practices , 2004 .

[37]  Jun Xu,et al.  A six‐stage model for the effective diffusion of knowledge management systems , 2005 .

[38]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small software company , 2001, ECIS.

[39]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[40]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Special Issue on: Knowledge Management in Asia Understanding Seeking from Electronic Knowledge Repositories: , 2022 .

[41]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel , 2000 .

[42]  Mu-Yen Chen,et al.  Integrating option model and knowledge management performance measures: an empirical study , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[43]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[44]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[46]  Gary F. Templeton,et al.  Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Sandra Moffett,et al.  Technology and people factors in knowledge management: An empirical analysis , 2003 .

[48]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[49]  R. Armacost,et al.  HELPING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT BE ALL IT CAN BE , 2002 .

[50]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  Gwo-Guang Lee,et al.  Effects of socio‐technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[52]  C. Fiol Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[53]  Ganesh D. Bhatt,et al.  Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[54]  Chin-Tsang Ho,et al.  Knowledge management enablers: a case study , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..