Longitudinal assessment of the effect of concentration on stream N uptake rates in an urbanizing watershed

We examined the effect of concentration on nitrogen uptake patterns for a suburban stream in Maryland and addressed the question: How does NO3− uptake change as a function of concentration and how do uptake patterns compare with those found for NH4+? We applied a longitudinal (stream channel corridor) approach in a forested stream section and conducted short-term nutrient addition experiments in late summer 2004. In the downstream direction, NO3− concentrations decreased because of residential development in headwaters and downstream dilution; NH4+ concentrations slightly increased. The uptake patterns for NO3− were very different from NH4+. While NH4+ had a typical negative relationship between first-order uptake rate constant (Kc) and stream size, NO3− had a reverse pattern. We found differences for other metrics, including uptake velocity (Vf) and areal uptake rate (U). We attributed these differences to a stream size effect, a concentration effect and a biological uptake capacity effect. For NO3− these combined effects produced a downstream increase in Kc, Vf and U; for NH4+ they produced a downstream decrease in Kc and Vf, and a not well defined pattern for U. We attributed a downstream increase in NO3− uptake capacity to an increase in hyporheic exchange and a likely increase in carbon availability. We also found that Kc and Vf were indirectly related with concentration. Similar evidence of ‘nutrient saturation’ has been reported in other recent studies. Our results suggest that higher-order uptake models might be warranted when scaling NO3− uptake across watersheds that are subject to increased nitrogen loading.

[1]  L. Claessens,et al.  Hydro‐ecological linkages in urbanizing watersheds: An empirical assessment of in‐stream nitrate loss and evidence of saturation kinetics , 2009 .

[2]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Effects of Watershed Perturbation on Stream Potassium and Calcium Dynamics , 1979 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Resource spiralling: an operational paradigm for analyzing lotic ecosystems , 1980 .

[4]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  A new metric for determining the importance of transient storage , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  S. Hamilton,et al.  N uptake as a function of concentration in streams , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  G. Lamberti,et al.  Methods in stream ecology , 1997 .

[7]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Nitrogen Fluxes and Retention in Urban Watershed Ecosystems , 2004, Ecosystems.

[8]  F. Bormann,et al.  Concepts and Methods for Assessing Solute Dynamics in Stream Ecosystems , 2007 .

[9]  Gregory E Schwarz,et al.  The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality1 , 2007, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[10]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams , 2001, Science.

[11]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading , 2008, Nature.

[12]  A. Hershey,et al.  Long‐term responses of the kuparuk river ecosystem to phosphorus fertilization , 2004 .

[13]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Relating nutrient uptake with transient storage in forested mountain streams , 2002 .

[14]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Whole-system Estimates of Nitrification and Nitrate Uptake in Streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest , 2002, Ecosystems.

[15]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE IN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1998 .

[16]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[17]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[18]  L. Claessens,et al.  Transport‐based method for estimating in‐stream nitrogen uptake at ambient concentration from nutrient addition experiments , 2009 .

[19]  Nicholas G. Aumen,et al.  Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems , 1990 .

[20]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Measuring Nutrient Spiralling in Streams , 1981 .

[21]  R. Wetzel 19 – Dissolved Organic Carbon: Detrital Energetics, Metabolic Regulators, and Drivers of Ecosystem Stability of Aquatic Ecosystems1 , 2003 .

[22]  G. Likens,et al.  DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON ENRICHMENT ALTERS NITROGEN DYNAMICS IN A FOREST STREAM , 2002 .

[23]  S. Bartell,et al.  Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. , 1984 .

[24]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[25]  A. Hershey,et al.  Influence of stream size on ammonium and suspended particulate nitrogen processing , 2001 .

[26]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[27]  L. Claessens,et al.  Longitudinal and seasonal variation of stream N uptake in an urbanizing watershed: effect of organic matter, stream size, transient storage and debris dams , 2010 .

[28]  Elizabeth W. Boyer,et al.  Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. , 2002 .

[29]  M. Doyle,et al.  Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks , 2006 .

[30]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .

[31]  Wilfred M. Wollheim,et al.  Relationship between river size and nutrient removal , 2006 .