Integrating uncertainty quantification in reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) analysis in the conceptual and preliminary stages of chemical process design

Abstract Traditional analysis of a proposed process design uses average input values in the performance assessment model, thereby generating single-point estimates. The resulting estimates ignore reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) considerations, or assume a fixed value based on prior experience. As a result, a probabilistic view of the impact of equipment unavailability on process profitability is not considered. Recent works have proposed a financial framework for incorporating safety and sustainability considerations in the analysis of proposed designs. Based on this research, we propose a framework to integrate RAM aspects during the conceptual design stage in a probabilistic manner using Monte Carlo simulation. Subsequently, full distribution profiles of key process performance indicators are generated, including system and section availability, annual net profit, and return on investment (ROI). Probabilistic characterization of equipment availability also facilitates the prediction of potential safety and sustainability issues, as more frequent process upsets may result in increased flaring and other potential negative consequences. A modified availability metric, using restoration instead of repair times, is used in this work to obtain a more accurate view of expected downtime and thus its effects on profitability. A propane dehydrogenation (PDH) process system is used to demonstrate the application and benefits of the framework. The proposed approach allows designers and decision-makers to comprehensively assess the impacts of equipment RAM characteristics on process availability and economic performance.

[1]  Vasiliki Kazantzi,et al.  A process design approach to manage the uncertainty of industrial flaring during abnormal operations , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[2]  Ernest J. Henley,et al.  Process reliability analysis , 1975 .

[3]  H. Goel,et al.  Optimal reliability design of process systems at the conceptual stage of design , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[4]  Srinivas Sriramula,et al.  Stochastic techno-economic considerations in biodiesel production , 2015 .

[5]  Srinivas Sriramula,et al.  A Hybrid Method for Stochastic Performance Modeling and Optimization of Chemical Engineering Processes , 2015 .

[6]  Pandu R. Tadikamalla,et al.  Applied Simulation Modeling , 2003 .

[7]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2011 .

[8]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Incorporating inherent safety during the conceptual process design stage: A literature review , 2020 .

[9]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimal design of reliable integrated chemical production sites , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  D. F. Rudd,et al.  Reliability Theory in Chemical System Design , 1962 .

[11]  Yi-Kuei Lin,et al.  Reliability evaluation for a manufacturing network with multiple production lines , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk-based operational performance analysis using loss functions , 2014 .

[13]  Xiao-Ning Li,et al.  Conceptual process synthesis: past and current trends , 2004 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Mixed-integer nonlinear programming models for optimal design of reliable chemical plants , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[16]  Jin-Kuk Kim,et al.  Availability and reliability considerations in the design and optimisation of flexible utility systems , 2008 .

[17]  Masaaki Muraki,et al.  Life cycle oriented process synthesis at conceptual planning phase , 1997 .

[18]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Incorporation of Safety and Sustainability in Conceptual Design via a Return on Investment Metric , 2018 .

[19]  Dennis C. Alexander.  Application Of Monte Carlo Simulations To System Reliability Analysis , 2003 .

[20]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Sustainable Process Design Approach for On-Purpose Propylene Production and Intensification , 2018 .

[21]  Markku Hurme,et al.  Comparison of inherent safety indices in process concept evaluation , 2005 .

[22]  Luigi Fratta,et al.  Synthesis of Available Networks , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[23]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Application of loss functions in process economic risk assessment , 2016 .

[25]  A. Costes,et al.  Fast Algorithm for Reliability and Cost of a Complex Network , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[26]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  A return on investment metric for incorporating sustainability in process integration and improvement projects , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[27]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Sustainable Design Through Process Integration: Fundamentals and Applications to Industrial Pollution Prevention, Resource Conservation, and Profitability Enhancement , 2011 .

[28]  Bipin V. Vora.  Development of Dehydrogenation Catalysts and Processes , 2012, Topics in Catalysis.

[29]  Srinivas Sriramula,et al.  Reliability of complex chemical engineering processes , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[30]  F. You,et al.  Comparative Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Ethylene and Propylene Manufacturing from Wet Shale Gas and Naphtha , 2017 .

[31]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A review of safety indices for process design , 2016 .

[32]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Mitigation of operational failures via an economic framework of reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) during conceptual design , 2020 .

[33]  Scott J. Bury,et al.  A discrete event simulation model for reliability modeling of a chemical plant , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[34]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Inherently safer design review and their timing during chemical process development and design , 2016 .

[35]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Assessment of the availability of an offshore installation by Monte Carlo simulation , 2006 .

[36]  Sam L. Savage.  Decision Making with Insight (with Insight.xla 2.0 and CD-ROM) , 2003 .

[37]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Involving economic, environmental and safety issues in the optimal purification of biobutanol , 2016 .

[38]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  An Integrated Framework to Address Criticality in Biomass Tri-Generation Systems via Redundancy Allocation , 2018, Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability.

[39]  Sonja Schreurs,et al.  Combining Monte Carlo simulations and experimental design for incorporating risk and uncertainty in investment decisions for cleantech: a fast pyrolysis case study , 2018, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[40]  Andrea P. Ortiz-Espinoza,et al.  Techno-Economic Assessment and Environmental Impact of Shale Gas Alternatives to Methanol , 2014 .

[41]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Managing uncertainties in a safety-constrained process system for solvent selection and usage: an optimization approach with technical, economic, and risk factors , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.