Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex.

Aperiodicity of speech alters voice quality. The current study investigated the relationship between vowel aperiodicity and human auditory cortical N1m and sustained field (SF) responses with magnetoencephalography. Behavioral estimates of vocal roughness perception were also collected. Stimulus aperiodicity was experimentally varied by increasing vocal jitter with techniques that model the mechanisms of natural speech production. N1m and SF responses for vowels with high vocal jitter were reduced in amplitude as compared to those elicited by vowels of normal vocal periodicity. Behavioral results indicated that the ratings of vocal roughness increased up to the highest jitter values. Based on these findings, the representation of vocal jitter in the auditory cortex is suggested to be formed on the basis of reduced activity in periodicity-sensitive neural populations.

[1]  F. Emanuel,et al.  Some waveform and spectral features of vowel roughness. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  Hannu Tiitinen,et al.  Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Patterson,et al.  The effect of temporal context on the sustained pitch response in human auditory cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  M. D. Fresneda,et al.  Acoustic and Perceptual Indicators of Normal and Pathological Voice , 2003, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[6]  P. Lieberman.  Some Acoustic Measures of the Fundamental Periodicity of Normal and Pathologic Larynges , 1963 .

[7]  Stefan Uppenkamp,et al.  Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Depth electrode recordings show double dissociation between pitch processing in lateral Heschl’s gyrus and sound onset processing in medial Heschl’s gyrus , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Perception of aperiodicities in synthetically generated voices. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T. Murry,et al.  Selected acoustic characteristics of pathologic and normal speakers. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Sustained Magnetic Fields Reveal Separate Sites for Sound Level and Temporal Regularity in Human Auditory Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  R. Hari,et al.  Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain localization of neural generators , 1980, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  R. W. Wendahl,et al.  Some parameters of auditory roughness. , 1966, Folia phoniatrica.

[14]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[17]  J. Kreiman,et al.  When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[20]  K Mathiak,et al.  Differential impact of periodic and aperiodic speech‐like acoustic signals on magnetic M50/M100 fields , 2000, Neuroreport.

[21]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  A Neural Representation of Pitch Salience in Nonprimary Human Auditory Cortex Revealed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Patterson,et al.  The Processing of Temporal Pitch and Melody Information in Auditory Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[23]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: Hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[24]  K. Palomäki,et al.  The periodic structure of vowel sounds is reflected in human electromagnetic brain responses , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  S. Iwata,et al.  Pitch perturbations in normal and pathologic voices. , 1970, Folia phoniatrica.

[26]  M Hoke,et al.  The auditory evoked sustained field: origin and frequency dependence. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Yoshiharu Soeta,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise , 2005, Hearing Research.

[28]  Y. Horii.  Fundamental frequency perturbation observed in sustained phonation. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Cortical sensitivity to periodicity of speech sounds. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  B Lütkenhöner,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  P. Alku,et al.  A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.