Testing different classification methods in airborne hyperspectral imagery processing.

To enhance the efficiency of machine-learning algorithms of optical remote sensing imagery processing, optimization techniques are evolved of the land surface objects pattern recognition. Different methods of supervised classification are considered for these purposes, including the metrical classifier operating with Euclidean distance between any points of the multi-dimensional feature space given by registered spectra, the K-nearest neighbors classifier based on a majority vote for neighboring pixels of the recognized objects, the Bayesian classifier of statistical decision making, the Support Vector Machine classifier dealing with stable solutions of the mini-max optimization problem and their different modifications. We describe the related techniques applied for selected test regions to compare the listed classifiers.

[1]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[2]  S. Salzberg,et al.  A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features , 2004, Machine Learning.

[3]  V. V. Kozoderov,et al.  A system for processing hyperspectral imagery: application to detecting forest species , 2014 .

[4]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Unsupervised Selection of Training Samples for Tree Species Classification Using Hyperspectral Data , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Vladimir V Kozoderov,et al.  Improved technique for retrieval of forest parameters from hyperspectral remote sensing data. , 2015, Optics express.

[6]  G. Golub,et al.  Eigenvalue computation in the 20th century , 2000 .

[7]  V. V. Kozoderov,et al.  Bayesian classifier applications of airborne hyperspectral imagery processing for forested areas , 2015 .

[8]  A. Hovi,et al.  Evaluation of simulated bands in airborne optical sensors for tree species identification , 2013 .

[9]  V. Vapnik,et al.  Bounds on Error Expectation for Support Vector Machines , 2000, Neural Computation.

[10]  Andrew O. Finley,et al.  Delineation of forest/nonforest land use classes using nearest neighbor methods , 2004 .

[11]  V. V. Kozoderov,et al.  COGNITIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING DATA PROCESSING , 2015 .

[12]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[13]  H. Goluba,et al.  Eigenvalue computation in the 20 th century Gene , 2000 .

[14]  Julian Besag,et al.  Digital Image Processing: Towards Bayesian image analysis , 1989 .

[15]  Vladimir V Kozoderov,et al.  Retrieval of forest stand attributes using optical airborne remote sensing data. , 2014, Optics express.

[16]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Fusion of Hyperspectral and LIDAR Remote Sensing Data for Classification of Complex Forest Areas , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[18]  Chia-Hua Ho,et al.  Recent Advances of Large-Scale Linear Classification , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.