Schedule delay analysis of prefabricated housing production: A hybrid dynamic approach

Abstract Design, manufacturing, storage, transportation, and on-site assembly are fundamental processes in prefabricated housing production (PHP) in Hong Kong. However, these processes are fragmented and entail various risks that adversely affect the schedule performance of PHP, thereby causing frequent delay problems in PHP projects and hindering the government from satisfying the high housing demands. Accordingly, many researchers have examined these schedule risks to resolve these delay problems. However, none of these studies developed an effective tool for managing schedule risks of PHP by envisaging the key characteristics of schedule risks and PHP. Most of previous research regarding to the management of prefabrication construction tends to consider risks from static and isolated perspectives, despite that these risks are coherently interrelated with each other and their influence varies throughout the whole PHP process. To fill the research gaps, a hybrid dynamic model is developed in this research to evaluate and simulate the impact of identified schedule risks on the schedule performance of PHP in view of underlying interrelationships and interactions, employing the hybrid system dynamics (SD) and discrete event simulation (DES) method. The resulting hybrid model is validated through a serial of model structure tests and model behavior tests, with the use of data collected from a PHP project in Hong Kong. This study offers an in-depth understanding of how schedule performance of PHP are dynamically influenced by interrelationships and interactions underlying various schedule risk variables. The developed model not only has the benefits of ease of modifying model structure to reflect real schedule situation of PHP project, performing various risk analyses and communicating with simulation results, but also is of value of providing an experiment platform for identifying and determining managerial and technical solutions proposed to minimize and mitigate the influence of corresponding schedule risks prior to implementation.

[1]  Julio C. Martinez.  Methodology for Conducting Discrete-Event Simulation Studies in Construction Engineering and Management , 2010 .

[2]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Modeling architecture for hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation , 2009 .

[3]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Regenerative sustainability for the built environment – from vision to reality: an introductory chapter , 2015 .

[4]  Vivian W. Y. Tam,et al.  An Examination on the Practice of Adopting Prefabrication for Construction Projects , 2007 .

[5]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management , 2006 .

[6]  Khalied Hyari,et al.  Optimal Planning and Scheduling for Repetitive Construction Projects , 2006 .

[7]  Osman Balci.  Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study , 1994, WSC '94.

[8]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model , 2016 .

[9]  Hedley Rees,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1985 .

[10]  Margaret K.Y. Mok,et al.  Schedule risks in prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong: a social network analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Off-Site Construction Planning Using Discrete Event Simulation , 2012 .

[12]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Prefabrication as a mean of minimizing construction waste on site , 2014 .

[13]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction , 2014 .

[14]  David Raffo,et al.  Application of a hybrid process simulation model to a software development project , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[15]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction , 2007 .

[16]  John Bowers,et al.  System dynamics in project management: a comparative analysis with traditional methods , 1996 .

[17]  Andrei. Borshchev,et al.  The Big Book of Simulation Modeling: Multimethod Modeling with Anylogic 6 , 2013 .

[18]  Liyin Shen,et al.  A comparative analysis of waste management requirements between five green building rating systems for new residential buildings , 2016 .

[19]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[20]  Ming Lu,et al.  SIMPLIFIED DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTION SIMULATION , 2003 .

[21]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Strategic-Operational Construction Management: Hybrid System Dynamics and Discrete Event Approach , 2008 .

[22]  Maged Georgy,et al.  Evolutionary resource scheduler for linear projects , 2008 .

[23]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Best practice of prefabrication implementation in the Hong Kong public and private sectors , 2015 .

[24]  David N. Ford,et al.  Dynamic modeling of product development processes , 1998 .

[25]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Industrial Dynamics---After the First Decade , 1968 .

[26]  Hong Zhang.  Discrete-Event Simulation for Estimating Emissions from Construction Processes , 2015 .

[27]  C. M. Tam,et al.  Cutting Construction Wastes by Prefabrication , 2006 .