Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships

This study analyzed the relationship between social capital and knowledge creation at the individual level. Our limited theory of knowledge creation encompasses the number and strength of the relationships that a person maintains. Hypothesis tests in a sample of biomedical research scientists strongly supported predictions. As relationships increased in number, returns to knowledge creation diminished. Increased interactions with a single other showed a similar effect. The strength of interpersonal relations had a higher marginal effect on knowledge creation than the number of relations.

[1]  Robert K. Merton.  Social theory and social structure : toward the codification of theory and research , 1951 .

[2]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[3]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[4]  Hagstrom and Sharon Reply: Universities and Departments as Units in the Stratification of Academic Organizations , 1972 .

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Jeremy Boissevain,et al.  Friends of friends : networks, manipulators and coalitions , 1974 .

[7]  M. Mulkay.  Norms and ideology in science , 1976 .

[8]  Trond Petersen,et al.  A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit Models , 1985 .

[9]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Inequality in Scientific Performance: Adjustment for Attribution and Journal Impact , 1991 .

[11]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[12]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[14]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[15]  M. Shapiro,et al.  The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  M. Brewer,et al.  Collaboration Structure and Information Dilemmas in Biotechnology: Organizational Boundaries as Trust Production , 1994 .

[17]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[18]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[19]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[20]  Arnold Thackray,et al.  Private science : biotechnology and the rise of the molecular sciences , 1998 .

[21]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Towards knowledge networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[22]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[23]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[24]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[25]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[26]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[27]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .