Complications of central venous catheter insertion in a teaching hospital.

INTRODUCTION Central venous catheters are fundamental to daily clinical practice. This procedure is mainly performed by residents, often without supervision or structured training. OBJECTIVE To describe the characteristics of central venous catheterization and the complication rate related to it. METHOD Retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing central venous catheter insertion out of the intensive care unit (ICU) of a teaching hospital were selected from March 2014 to February 2015. Data were collected from medical charts using an electronic form. Clinical and laboratory characteristics from patients, procedure characteristics, and mechanical and infectious complications rates were assessed. Patients with and without complications were compared. RESULTS Three hundred and eleven (311) central venous catheterizations were evaluated. The main reasons to perform the procedure were lack of peripheral access, chemotherapy and sepsis. There were 20 mechanical complications (6% of procedures). Arterial puncture was the most common. Procedures performed in the second semester were associated with lower risk of complications (odds ratio 0.35 [95CI 0.12-0.98; p=0.037]). Thirty-five (35) catheter-related infection cases (11.1%) were reported. They were related to younger patients and procedures performed by residents with more than one year of training. Procedures performed after the first trimester had a lower chance of infection. CONCLUSION These results show that the rate of mechanical complications of central venous puncture in our hospital is similar to the literature, but more attention should be given to infection prevention measures.

[1]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Incidence of Mechanical Complications of Central Venous Catheterization Using Landmark Technique , 2016, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[2]  P. Kalfon,et al.  Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Wiener,et al.  The Impact of a Medical Procedure Service on Patient Safety, Procedure Quality and Resident Training Opportunities , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Reston Smith,et al.  Central venous catheters , 2013, BMJ.

[5]  E. Abdala,et al.  Infection Related to Implantable Central Venous Access Devices in Cancer Patients: Epidemiology and Risk Factors , 2013, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  M. Elbarbary,et al.  Evidence-based consensus on the insertion of central venous access devices: definition of minimal requirements for training. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Cara J Hamann,et al.  Simulation Training in Central Venous Catheter Insertion: Improved Performance in Clinical Practice , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Using Patient Safety Indicators to Estimate the Impact of Potential Adverse Events on Outcomes , 2008, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[9]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  Jeffrey S. Berger,et al.  Mechanical Complications of Central Venous Catheters , 2006, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[12]  L. Lorente,et al.  Catheter-related infection in critically ill patients , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[13]  Michael K Gould,et al.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Ralph Gonzales,et al.  Procedural experience and comfort level in internal medicine trainees , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  Donald Berwick,et al.  Developing and Testing Changes in Delivery of Care , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  I. Raad,et al.  Intravascular-catheter-related infections , 1998, The Lancet.

[17]  Carlos Eli Piccinato,et al.  Complicações precoces e tardias em acesso venoso central. Análise de 66 implantes , 2000 .