Acute Damage to the Posterior Limb of the Internal Capsule on Diffusion Tensor Tractography as an Early Imaging Predictor of Motor Outcome after Stroke

Practical applications of diffusion tensor imaging are few, but this seems to be an interesting and a potentially important one: can it be used to predict motor outcome after stroke? Sixty patients within 12 hours of stroke were assessed with tractography at 5 different locations in the corticospinal tracts at admission, and at days 3 and 30. Patients with acute damage to the posterior limb of the internal capsule had the worst outcome and clinical severity at presentation. Conclusions: In the acute setting, tractography is promising for stroke mapping to predict motor outcome. Acute corticospinal tract damage at the level of the posterior limb of the internal capsule is a significant predictor of unfavorable motor outcome. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early prediction of motor outcome is of interest in stroke management. We aimed to determine whether lesion location at DTT is predictive of motor outcome after acute stroke and whether this information improves the predictive accuracy of the clinical scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 60 consecutive patients within 12 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke onset. We used DTT to evaluate CST involvement in the motor cortex and premotor cortex, centrum semiovale, corona radiata, and PLIC and in combinations of these regions at admission, at day 3, and at day 30. Severity of limb weakness was assessed by using the motor subindex scores of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (5a, 5b, 6a, 6b). We calculated volumes of infarct and fractional anisotropy values in the CST of the pons. RESULTS: Acute damage to the PLIC was the best predictor associated with poor motor outcome, axonal damage, and clinical severity at admission (P < .001). There was no significant correlation between acute infarct volume and motor outcome at day 90 (P = .176, r = 0.485). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of acute CST involvement at the level of the PLIC for motor outcome at day 90 were 73.7%, 100%, 100%, and 89.1%, respectively. In the acute stage, DTT predicted motor outcome at day 90 better than the clinical scores (R2 = 75.50, F = 80.09, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the acute setting, DTT is promising for stroke mapping to predict motor outcome. Acute CST damage at the level of the PLIC is a significant predictor of unfavorable motor outcome.

[1]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  High-resolution line scan diffusion tensor MR imaging of white matter fiber tract anatomy. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  J. De Keyser,et al.  Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. , 1999, Stroke.

[3]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Motor outcome according to the integrity of the corticospinal tract determined by diffusion tensor tractography in the early stage of corona radiata infarct , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  M. Wong,et al.  Brain lesion size and location: effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[6]  H. Diener,et al.  European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management – Update 2003 , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[7]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  Lesion Load of the Corticospinal Tract Predicts Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[8]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of internal capsule lesions on outcome of motor hand function at one year post-stroke. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  M Nakagawa,et al.  MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts , 2005, Neurology.

[10]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[11]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .

[12]  W De Weerdt,et al.  Predicting arm recovery following stroke: value of site of lesion , 2000, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[13]  A. Geurts,et al.  Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  P M Matthews,et al.  Axonal injury in the internal capsule correlates with motor impairment after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[15]  S. Jang,et al.  Motor outcome according to diffusion tensor tractography findings in the early stage of intracerebral hemorrhage , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  T Brott,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: lesion size by computed tomography. , 1989, Stroke.

[17]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[18]  S. Jang,et al.  Motor outcome prediction using diffusion tensor tractography in pontine infarct , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[19]  A. Geurts,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  J. Provenzale,et al.  Systematic Review of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging for Assessment of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  W. Koroshetz,et al.  Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trials. The RANTTAS Investigators. , 1999, Stroke.

[22]  S. Wakana,et al.  Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  F Prados,et al.  Wallerian Degeneration in the Corticospinal Tract Evaluated by Diffusion Tensor Imaging Correlates with Motor Deficit 30 Days after Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  M. Reding,et al.  Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[25]  C. Weiller,et al.  Checkerboard fields in multiple sclerosis , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[26]  M. Chou,et al.  Principles and Limitations of Computational Algorithms in Clinical Diffusion Tensor MR Tractography , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[27]  A. Alexander,et al.  White matter tractography using diffusion tensor deflection , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[28]  White matter tractography by diffusion tensor imaging plays an important role in prognosis estimation of acute lacunar infarctions. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  B. Volpe,et al.  Motor Impairment as a Predictor of Functional Recovery and Guide to Rehabilitation Treatment After Stroke , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[30]  Sung Hyun Kim,et al.  Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  Ferran Prados,et al.  DTIWeb: A Web-Based Framework for DTI Data Visualization and Processing , 2007, ICCSA.

[32]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[33]  M. Mura,et al.  Dementia, pyramidal system involvement, and leukoencephalopathy with a presenilin 1 mutation , 2006, Neurology.

[34]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[35]  H. Urbach,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Pyramidal Tractography in Patients With Anterior Choroidal Artery Infarcts , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[36]  P M Matthews,et al.  Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke by segmentation of functional motor pathways. , 2000, Stroke.

[37]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Assessing tissue viability with MR diffusion and perfusion imaging. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[38]  E. Melhem,et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography: exploring brain microstructure and connectivity. , 2007, Radiology.