Brain Networks Supporting Execution of Mathematical Skills versus Acquisition of New Mathematical Competence

This fMRI study examines how students extend their mathematical competence. Students solved a set of algebra-like problems. These problems included Regular Problems that have a known solution technique and Exception Problems that but did not have a known technique. Two distinct networks of activity were uncovered. There was a Cognitive Network that was mainly active during the solution of problems and showed little difference between Regular Problems and Exception Problems. There was also a Metacognitive Network that was more engaged during a reflection period after the solution and was much more engaged for Exception Problems than Regular Problems. The Cognitive Network overlaps with prefrontal and parietal regions identified in the ACT-R theory of algebra problem solving and regions identified in the triple-code theory as involved in basic mathematical cognition. The Metacognitive Network included angular gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and anterior prefrontal regions. This network is mainly engaged by the need to modify the solution procedure and not by the difficulty of the problem. Only the Metacognitive Network decreased with practice on the Exception Problems. Activity in the Cognitive Network during the solution of an Exception Problem predicted both success on that problem and future mastery. Activity in the angular gyrus and middle temporal gyrus during feedback on errors predicted future mastery.

[1]  J. Decety,et al.  What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective‐taking , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Categorical and continuous - disentangling the neural correlates of the carry effect in multi-digit addition , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[3]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The roles of prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in algebra problem solving: A case of using cognitive modeling to inform neuroimaging data , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  Kimberly L. Ray,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  S. Petersen,et al.  The maturing architecture of the brain's default network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociating Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex Activation during Arithmetic Processing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: a functional MRI study. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[9]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[11]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Mathematically gifted adolescents use more extensive and more bilateral areas of the fronto-parietal network than controls during executive functioning and fluid reasoning tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Functional and Structural Alterations of the Intraparietal Sulcus in a Developmental Dyscalculia of Genetic Origin , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[16]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  Neural correlates of arithmetic calculation strategies , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  Shawn Betts,et al.  Cognitive and Metacognitive Activity in Mathematical Problem Solving: Prefrontal and Parietal Patterns It Also Appears to Play a Key Role in Retrieval of Arithmetic , 2022 .

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Pandya,et al.  Projections to the frontal cortex from the posterior parietal region in the rhesus monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  J. Baldo,et al.  Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study , 2010, Brain and Language.

[25]  Matteo Pardini,et al.  Integral calculus problem solving: an fMRI investigation , 2008, Neuroreport.

[26]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: Evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex , 2000, Psychobiology.

[27]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[28]  David Badre,et al.  Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  The Neural Development of an Abstract Concept of Number , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[31]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[32]  R W Cox,et al.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[33]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[34]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[35]  Susan M. Ravizza,et al.  Errors of mathematical processing: The relationship of accuracy to neural regions associated with retrieval or representation of the problem state , 2008, Brain Research.

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Behavioral equivalence, but not neural equivalence—neural evidence of alternative strategies in mathematical thinking , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Randy L Buckner,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Control Processes in Memory , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Nina F Dronkers,et al.  The role of inferior parietal and inferior frontal cortex in working memory. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[41]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..