Multi-lifespan Design Thinking: Two Methods and a Case Study with the Rwandan Diaspora

In recent years, the HCI community has recognized the need to address long(er) term information system design around on-going societal problems. Yet how to engage stakeholders effectively in multi-lifespan design thinking remains an open challenge. Toward that end, the work reported here extends an established envisioning method by introducing two new design methods, the multi-lifespan timeline and multi-lifespan co-design, with an emphasis on the element of (long) time. The new methods aim to stimulate participants' visions of future information systems by: (a) enhancing participants' understanding of longer timeframes (e.g., 100 years), and (b) guiding participants to effectively project themselves long into the future in their design thinking. We explored these multi-lifespan design methods in work with 51 Africans from Rwanda and the Great Lakes region living in the USA to understand the challenges and opportunities they envision for designing future information systems for transitional justice in Rwanda. Contributions are two-fold: (1) methodological innovation, and (2) a case study of multi-lifespan design thinking generated by diaspora members of post-conflict societies.

[1]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Envisioning across generations: a multi-lifespan information system for international justice in rwanda , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Design in Groups—and All That Jazz , 2003 .

[3]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-Lifespan Information System Design in Support of Transitional Justice: Evolving Situated Design Principles for the Long(er) Term , 2017, Interacting with computers.

[4]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts , 2013, CHI.

[5]  Robert Jungk,et al.  Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures , 1996 .

[6]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan information system design: a research initiative for the hci community , 2010, CHI.

[7]  John Etherton,et al.  Designing for and with diaspora: a case study of work for the truth and reconciliation commission of liberia , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design , 1992 .

[9]  Stuart Reeves,et al.  Human values in curating a human rights media archive , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan information system design: investigating a new design approach in Rwanda , 2011, iConference.

[11]  P. Uvin,et al.  Ethnicity and power in Burundi and Rwanda: different paths to mass violence. , 1999, Comparative politics.

[12]  I. Barker How to be a witness in court , 1994 .

[13]  Stuart Reeves,et al.  Envisioning ubiquitous computing , 2012, CHI.

[14]  John Etherton,et al.  MOSES: exploring new ground in media and post-conflict reconciliation , 2010, CHI.