Interstitial fluid pressure and associated lymph node metastasis revealed in tumors by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Elevated interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) in tumors can cause metastatic dissemination and treatment resistance, but its study poses a challenge because of a paucity of noninvasive imaging strategies. In this study, we address this issue by reporting the development of a noninvasive tool to assess tumor IFP and interstitial hypertension-induced lymph node metastasis. Using mouse xenograft models of several types of human cancer, we used gadolinium diethylene-triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as a contrast agent for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Immediately after Gd-DTPA administration, a high-signal-intensity rim was observed in the tumor periphery, which moved outward with time. Assuming the velocity of Gd-DTPA to be equal to the fluid flow velocity, we used a simple model of peritumoral interstitial fluid flow to calculate the fluid flow velocity at the tumor surface (v(0)) based on the rim movement. Significant positive correlations were found between v(0) and IFP in all tumor xenografts. Moreover, the primary tumors of metastasis-positive mice displayed higher IFP and v(0) than the primary tumors of metastasis-negative mice. Findings were confirmed in cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases, where we found v(0) to be higher compared with patients without lymph node involvement (P < 0.00001). Together, these findings establish that Gd-DTPA-based DCE-MRI can noninvasively visualize tumor IFP, and they reveal the potential for v(0) determined by this method to serve as a novel general biomarker of tumor aggressiveness.

[1]  N. Weidner Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[2]  A. Hargens,et al.  A simple method for measuring interstitial fluid pressure in cancer tissues. , 2005, Microvascular research.

[3]  S. Fox,et al.  Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[4]  Johanne Bézy-Wendling,et al.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of vascular-extravascular exchanges during liver carcinogenesis: application to MRI contrast agents. , 2007, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[5]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Assessment of tumor hypoxia and interstitial fluid pressure by gadomelitol-based dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  W. Jiang,et al.  Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. , 2011, Frontiers in bioscience.

[7]  R K Jain,et al.  Delivery of novel therapeutic agents in tumors: physiological barriers and strategies. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  T. Hompland,et al.  Revealed in Tumors by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Associated Lymph Node Metastasis , 2012 .

[9]  R K Jain,et al.  Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. , 1992, Cancer research.

[10]  Anthony Fyles,et al.  Correlations between dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–derived measures of tumor microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervical cancer , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Hypoxia-associated spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in human melanoma xenografts: involvement of microvascular hot spots induced in hypoxic foci by interleukin 8 , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Metastasis in melanoma xenografts is associated with tumor microvascular density rather than extent of hypoxia. , 2010, Neoplasia.

[13]  R K Jain,et al.  Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. , 1990, Cancer research.

[14]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. , 1987, Cancer research.

[15]  Kristian Pietras,et al.  High interstitial fluid pressure — an obstacle in cancer therapy , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. , 2007, Cancer research.

[17]  N. Rofsky,et al.  Hepatic metastases: perilesional enhancement on dynamic MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Swartz,et al.  Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: linking mechanobiology with immunity , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  Melody A Swartz,et al.  A driving force for change: interstitial flow as a morphoregulator. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[20]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Assessment of fraction of radiobiologically hypoxic cells in human melanoma xenografts by dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  G. Jayson,et al.  Intra-tumoural microvessel density in human solid tumours , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  M. Cho,et al.  Interstitial Fluid Pressure as a Prognostic Factor in Cervical Cancer Following Radiation Therapy , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  P. Gullino,et al.  Diffusion and convection in normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1974, Cancer research.

[24]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Assessment of tumor blood perfusion by high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI: A preclinical study of human melanoma xenografts , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Microenvironment-associated lymph node metastasis of human cervical carcinoma xenografts , 2012, Acta oncologica.

[26]  T. Uematsu,et al.  Rim-enhancing breast masses with smooth or spiculated margins on magnetic resonance imaging: histopathology and clinical significance , 2011, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[27]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Two different types of ring‐like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer: Correlation with the histopathologic findings , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Kristine Gulliksrud,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor interstitial fluid pressure. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[30]  Melody A Swartz,et al.  Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[31]  A. Fyles,et al.  Long-term performance of interstial fluid pressure and hypoxia as prognostic factors in cervix cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  B. Yin,et al.  Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Features of Gliosarcoma: A Study of 54 Cases , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[33]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Associations between Radiocurability and Interstitial Fluid Pressure in Human Tumor Xenografts without Hypoxic Tissue , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  R K Jain,et al.  Delivery of Molecular Medicine to Solid Tumors , 1996, Science.

[35]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Pulmonary and lymph node metastasis is associated with primary tumor interstitial fluid pressure in human melanoma xenografts. , 2002, Cancer research.

[36]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Human cervical carcinoma xenograft models for studies of the physiological microenvironment of tumors , 2009, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[37]  D. Hedley,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements. , 2001, Cancer research.

[38]  Anthony Fyles,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure in tumors: therapeutic barrier and biomarker of angiogenesis. , 2008, Future oncology.

[39]  C. Davies,et al.  Collagenase Increases the Transcapillary Pressure Gradient and Improves the Uptake and Distribution of Monoclonal Antibodies in Human Osteosarcoma Xenografts , 2004, Cancer Research.

[40]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Fluctuating and Diffusion-Limited Hypoxia in Hypoxia-Induced Metastasis , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  H. Kurachi,et al.  MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation , 1997, Abdominal Imaging.

[42]  Edna Furman-Haran,et al.  Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of transport and interstitial fluid pressure in ectopic human lung tumors. , 2006, Cancer research.

[43]  J. Ewing,et al.  Phenomenological model of interstitial fluid pressure in a solid tumor. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Interstitial fluid pressure and vascularity of intradermal and intramuscular human tumor xenografts. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  R. Jain,et al.  A sensitive in vivo model for quantifying interstitial convective transport of injected macromolecules and nanoparticles. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[46]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Radiocurability is associated with interstitial fluid pressure in human tumor xenografts. , 2009, Neoplasia.