Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al. THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE VALUE OF ACADEMIC PATENTS , 2007 .
[2] S. Breschi,et al. THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .
[3] A. Geuna,et al. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .
[4] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .
[5] Carine Peeters,et al. Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms , 2006 .
[6] Waverly W. Ding,et al. The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .
[7] Stefano Breschi,et al. Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Case , 2006 .
[8] C. Peeters,et al. Economic and management perspectives on intellectual property rights , 2006 .
[9] Bronwyn H Hall,et al. Market value and patent citations , 2005 .
[10] M. Reitzig. Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .
[11] Dominique Guellec,et al. From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter? , 2004 .
[12] Martin Meyer,et al. Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.
[13] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .
[14] W. Powell,et al. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .
[15] Z. Griliches,et al. Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .
[16] Eleftherios Sapsalis,et al. Insight into the patenting performance of Belgian universities , 2003 .
[17] Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al. What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .
[18] M. Reitzig. What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry , 2003 .
[19] D. Harhoff,et al. Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .
[20] D. Teece. Managing Intellectual Capital , 2002 .
[21] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .
[22] Dominique Guellec,et al. The Value of Patents and Patenting Strategies: Countries and Technology Areas Patterns , 2002 .
[23] David C. Mowery,et al. Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .
[24] Scott Shane,et al. Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..
[25] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .
[26] Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al. Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output , 2001 .
[27] O. Granstrand. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property , 1999 .
[28] Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al. Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .
[29] Manuel Trajtenberg,et al. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .
[30] D. Harhoff,et al. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .
[31] David L. Deeds,et al. An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .
[32] Mark A. Schankerman,et al. The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .
[33] D. Harhoff,et al. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[34] H. Etzkowitz. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .
[35] Jean O. Lanjouw,et al. Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value , 1998 .
[36] E. Mansfield. Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .
[37] Walter W. Powell,et al. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences , 1998 .
[38] M. Trajtenberg,et al. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[39] Mark A. Schankerman,et al. Stylised Fact of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership , 1997 .
[40] Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .
[41] Greg A. Stevens,et al. 3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success! , 1997 .
[42] Greg A. Stevens,et al. 3,000 Raw Ideas Equals 1 Commercial Success! , 1997 .
[43] M. Trajtenberg,et al. University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .
[44] E. Mansfield,et al. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .
[45] Jean O. Lanjouw,et al. How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .
[46] E. Mansfield. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .
[47] M. Brewer,et al. Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .
[48] J. Lerner. The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .
[49] Edwin Mansfield,et al. Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .
[50] Z. Griliches. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .
[51] A. Jaffe. Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .
[52] A. Pakes,et al. The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity , 1986 .
[53] Ariel Pakes,et al. Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .