Pathology of Substitute Heart Valves: New Concepts and Developments

All types of contemporary cardiac valve substitutes suffer deficiencies and complications that limit their success. Mechanical and bioprosthetic valves are intrinsically obstructive, especially in small sizes. Mechanical valves are associated with thromboembollc problems; the chronic anticoagulation used in virtually all mechanlcal valve recipients causes hemorrhage in some. Calcification limits the success of porcine and pericardial bio‐prostheses, allograft valves, and the yet experimental trileaflet polymeric prostheses. The predominant mechanism of calcification in porcine, pericardial, and allogratt valves is cell mediated, being nucleated at the membranes and in organelles of the transplanted cells. In polymeric leaflet valves, calcification is both extrinsic (in adherent thrombus) and Intrinsic (subsurface and acellular in the solid elastomer). Nevertheless, except for a few notable exceptions, contemporary mechanical valves are durable. Other Important potential complications of prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves include paravalvular leak, endocarditis, or extrinsic interference with function. Moreover, aortic valvular allografts undergo progresshe noncalclfic degeneration, tearing, sagging, and/or retraction. Studies of retrieved long‐term cryopreserved allograft explants demonstrate severe degeneration, with distortion of normal architectural detail, loss of endothelial and deep connective tissue cells, and variable inflammatory cellularity. Thus, they are morphologically nonviable valves, whose structural basis for function seems primarily related to the largely preserved collagen, and they are unlikely to have the capacity to grow, remodel, or exhibit active metabolic functions. Since calcification intrinsic to the cusps is the major pathologic process necessitating bioprosthetic valve reoperations, efforts to prevent formation of mineral deposits are active. The most promising anticalcification techniques are preimplantation treatments of glutaraldehyde fixed tissue with either detergents such as sodium dodecyl sulfate, 2‐amino oleic acid, cations such as Fe3+ or Al3+, or dlphosphonate drugs such as ethane hydroxydiphosphonate, or tissue preservation alternatives to aldehydes, such as polyepoxide compounds or dye mediated photooxidation treatment. Promising innovative concepts also under Investigation include modifications of bioprosthetic valve stent design and tissue mounting techniques to reduce cuspal stresses, tissue treatments to enhance endothelialization, nonstented porclne valves, and minimally cross‐linked autologous pericardial valves. (J Card Surg 1994; 9[Suppl]:222–227)

[1]  R. Levy,et al.  Inhibition of calcification of glutaraldehyde pretreated porcine aortic valve cusps with sodium dodecyl sulfate: preincubation and controlled release studies. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  O. Hess,et al.  Cardiac Bioprostheses in the 1990s , 1993, Circulation.

[3]  W G Henderson,et al.  A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  F. Schoen,et al.  Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  W. Williams,et al.  Failure of Cryopreserved Homograft Valved Conduits in the Pulmonary Circulation , 1992, Circulation.

[6]  F J Schoen,et al.  Antimineralization treatments for bioprosthetic heart valves. Assessment of efficacy and safety. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  J. W. Love,et al.  Experimental evaluation of an autologous tissue heart valve. , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[8]  G. Thiene,et al.  Durability of glutaraldehyde-fixed pericardial valve prostheses: clinical and animal experimental studies. , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[9]  J. Parker Stentless aortic valve xenografts--a real advance? , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[10]  F. Schoen,et al.  Morphologic findings in explanted Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthetic valves. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  I. Vesely,et al.  Micromechanics and Mathematical Modeling: An Inside Look at Bioprosthetic Valve Function , 1992, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[13]  F. Schoen,et al.  Calcification of porcine valves: a successful new method of antimineralization. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  R. Levy,et al.  Heart valve bioprostheses: antimineralization. , 1992, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  F J Schoen,et al.  Pathological considerations in replacement cardiac valves. , 1992, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[16]  U. Losert,et al.  Biocompatibility of aldehyde-fixed bovine pericardium. An in vitro and in vivo approach toward improvement of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  I. Vesely,et al.  Effects of dynamic fixation on shear behaviour of porcine xenograft valves. , 1990, Biomaterials.