Regional differences of environmental efficiency of China's energy utilization and environmental regulation cost based on provincial panel data and DEA method

Abstract Recently, environmental pollution has attracted a lot of attention domestically and internationally. It is known that energy utilization is a major source of China’s environmental pollution. Measuring environmental efficiency of energy utilization in Chinese provinces first, the paper then offers decision supports for relevant departments in order to achieve sustainable development of energy and environment in China. This research chooses CO2 emission as a substitute variable for environmental effects of energy utilization and puts it into the study framework based on total-factor production theory to measure the environmental efficiency of energy utilization of each province and three major regions. On the basis of the above results this research further measures the cost of environmental regulation for each province. Provincial panel data during the period of 2000–2007 are used to carry out empirical study. The analysis indicates that the environmental efficiency of energy utilization in Chinese provinces varies greatly from each other, meaning that both economic output and CO2 emissions need considerable improvement. In addition, the results of empirical study also show that the environmental efficiency of energy utilization in China is quite low. Therefore, to ensure sustainable development of China’s energy, economy and environment, we should resort to advanced technology as the support to promote the efficient and clean utilization of energy resources. Besides, most Chinese provinces have spent quite a lot on environmental regulation, implying that in these provinces development of the economy and the environment are not in harmony. The contributions of this research are as follows: it constructs the models for measuring environmental efficiency of energy utilization in Chinese provinces; it introduces the idea of “environmental regulation” into research system and measures the environmental regulation cost of each Chinese province.

[1]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors , 2007 .

[2]  Kankana Mukherjee,et al.  Energy use efficiency in the Indian manufacturing sector: An interstate analysis , 2008 .

[3]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A cross-efficiency model based on super-efficiency for ranking units through the TOPSIS approach and its extension to the interval case , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[4]  Surendra Singh,et al.  Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique , 2009 .

[5]  Joseph M. Roop,et al.  Measuring industrial energy intensity: practical issues and problems , 1997 .

[6]  R. K. Cattell,et al.  Structural change and energy efficiency in industry , 1983 .

[7]  Satoshi Honma,et al.  Total-factor energy productivity growth of regions in Japan , 2009 .

[8]  Kankana Mukherjee,et al.  Measuring energy efficiency in the context of an emerging economy: The case of indian manufacturing , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[10]  Edward F. Renshaw,et al.  Energy efficiency and the slump in labour productivity in the USA , 1981 .

[11]  Jianling Zhang,et al.  Energy saving technologies and productive efficiency in the Chinese iron and steel sector , 2008 .

[12]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN APEC COUNTRIES , 1996 .

[13]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES , 1949 .

[14]  B. Wilson,et al.  Energy efficiency trends in Australia , 1994 .

[15]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes , 2000 .

[16]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[17]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[18]  G. Debreu.  The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[19]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies , 2007 .

[20]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa , 2005 .

[21]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[22]  Kankana Mukherjee,et al.  Energy use efficiency in U.S. manufacturing: A nonparametric analysis , 2008 .

[23]  G. Boyd,et al.  Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity , 2000 .

[24]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance , 2008 .

[25]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Interfuel substitution and decomposition of changes in industrial energy consumption , 1992 .

[26]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[27]  R. Goldsmith.  A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth , 1951 .

[28]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China , 2006 .

[29]  Solveig Glomsrød,et al.  Coal cleaning: a viable strategy for reduced carbon emissions and improved environment in China? , 2005 .

[30]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China's iron and steel sector , 2007 .

[31]  Li Yang,et al.  A new space‐time correlation coefficient and its comparison with Moran's Index on evaluation , 2011 .

[32]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[33]  Semih Önüt,et al.  Energy efficiency assessment for the Antalya Region hotels in Turkey , 2006 .