Therapeutic Value of Selective Salpingography for Infertile Women with Patent Fallopian Tubes: The Impact on Pregnancy Rate

Objective: To determine the therapeutic value of selective salpingography (SSG) for infertile women with patent fallopian tubes. Design: Retrospective, case-control analysis. Setting: University Hospital, infertility clinic. Patients: Infertile cases with patent tubes documented by hysterosalpingography (HSG) or by HSG followed by laparoscopic examination (n = 80). Intervention(s): Hysteroscopic SSG. Main Outcome Measure(s): Patency rate of tubes by SSG. Pregnancy rate following SSG. Result(s): Eighty cases were divided into the study group (SSG performed, 37 cases) and the case-control group (SSG not performed, 43 cases). Successful SSG of at least one tube was obtained in all of 37 cases (100%) in whom SSG was attempted. A patency rate of 95.9% was documented in the 73 cannulated tubes of these cases. The total subsequent pregnancy rate (48.6%) within 12 months of follow-up after SSG was significantly higher than that (11.6%) obtained in the control group (p < 0.001). The cumulative pregnancy rate in the study group was also significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusion(s): The findings of the present study encourage the application of SSG to infertile women, either as a sole therapeutic approach or in association with other methods of assisted reproductive technology, even if their fallopian tubes are shown to be patent by HSG.

[1]  J. Stanger,et al.  Differential impact on pregnancy rate of selective salpingography, tubal catheterization and wire-guide recanalization in the treatment of proximal fallopian tube obstruction. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[2]  P. Serafini,et al.  Selective salpingography with an insemination catheter in the treatment of women with cornual fallopian tube obstruction. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[3]  T. Koci,et al.  Transcervical fallopian tube catheterization and recanalization for proximal tubal obstruction. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  N. Gleicher,et al.  Standardization of hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography: a valuable adjunct to simple opacification studies. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  A. Maubon,et al.  Fallopian tube recanalization by selective salpingography: an alternative to more invasive techniques? , 1992, Human reproduction.

[6]  L. De Cecco,et al.  Transcervical selective salpingography: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to cases of proximal tubal injection failure. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  G. Letterie,et al.  Hysteroscopic cannulation and lavage in the treatment of proximal tubal occlusion. , 1987, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  F. Rasmussen,et al.  Therapeutic Value of Hysterosalpingography with Lipiodol Ultra Fluid , 1987, Acta radiologica.

[9]  C. Pieters,et al.  Fertility rate after hysterosalpingography with Sinografin. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Horbach,et al.  Factors influencing the pregnancy rate following hysterosalpingography and their prognostic significance. , 1973, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  J. Horbach,et al.  A comparison of the results of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of fallopian tube dysfunction. , 1972, Fertility and sterility.