The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in Orangutans

Fission-fusion systems can have the group or the individual as their primary unit. In group-based fission-fusion systems, predation risk reduction is the major benefit to grouping, in the individual-based ones the benefits are likely to be primarily social. Orangutans, like chimpanzees, are examples of an individual-based fission-fusion species. The orangutans inhabiting a Sumatran swamp forest (Suaq Balimbing) are more likely than elsewhere to form travel parties. As elsewhere, the main benefits of grouping are social: mating opportunities, protection from harassment and socialization of infants. Most animals also incur costs, but these are relatively low at Suaq Balimbing due to the high productivity of the swamp. Costs seem to be disproportionately high for females with mid-sized infants, who avoid parties.

[1]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Primate social systems , 1987 .

[2]  A. Sitompul,et al.  Manufacture and use of tools in wild Sumatran orangutans , 1996, Naturwissenschaften.

[3]  Carel P. van Schaik,et al.  Activity Periods of Indonesian Rain Forest Mammals , 1996 .

[4]  B. Galdikas,et al.  Orangutan sociality at Tanjung Puting , 1985, American journal of primatology.

[5]  R. Bshary,et al.  The formation of red colobus–diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  C. Schaik,et al.  Recognizing the Many Faces of Primate Food Competition: Methods , 1988 .

[7]  J. Mitani Orangutan activity budgets: Monthly variations and the effects of body size, parturition, and sociality , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[8]  Jito Sugardjito Selecting nest-sites of sumatran organ-utans,Pongo pygmaeus abelii in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia , 2006, Primates.

[9]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Punishment in animal societies , 1995, Nature.

[10]  R. Wrangham,et al.  Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  E. Fox The function of female mate choice in the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) , 1998 .

[12]  C. P. Schaik,et al.  The hidden costs of sociality: intra-group variation in feeding strategies in Sumatran long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) , 1986 .

[13]  C. P. Schaik,et al.  Scramble and Contest in Feeding Competition Among Female Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca Fascicularis) , 1988 .

[14]  R. Wrangham 16. Ecology and Social Relationships in Two Species of Chimpanzee , 1987 .

[15]  Michelle Y. Merrill,et al.  The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. , 1999, Journal of human evolution.

[16]  C. P. Schaik,et al.  Interannual variability in fruit abundance and the reproductive seasonality in Sumatran Long‐tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) , 2009 .

[17]  Richard W. Wrangham,et al.  Evolution of social structure , 1987 .

[18]  B. Galdikas Orangutan diet, range, and activity at Tanjung Puting, Central Borneo , 1988, International Journal of Primatology.

[19]  C. Chapman,et al.  Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. , 1990, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[20]  C. Schaik Why Are Diurnal Primates Living in Groups , 1983 .

[21]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  Variations in Subsistence Activities of Female and Male Pongids: New Perspectives on the Origins of Hominid Labor Division [and Comments] , 1981, Current Anthropology.

[22]  C. Schaik,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Toward an understanding of the orangutan's social system , 1996 .

[23]  J. Mitani,et al.  Mating behaviour of male orangutans in the Kutai Game Reserve, Indonesia , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Marina Cords,et al.  Primate Social Systems, Robin I.M. Dunbar. Christopher Helm, London (1988), viii, +373. Price £35.00 hardback, £17.50 paperback , 1988 .

[25]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[26]  J. Sugardjito,et al.  Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia , 1987, International Journal of Primatology.

[27]  C. Chapman Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  S. Austad,et al.  Mammalian aging, metabolism, and ecology: evidence from the bats and marsupials. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  Living fast and dying young: A comparative analysis of life‐history variation among mammals , 1990 .

[30]  J. Mitani,et al.  Association among wild orang-utans: sociality, passive aggregations or chance? , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  R. Wrangham,et al.  Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees : implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups , 1996 .

[32]  C. Boesch Great Ape Societies: Social grouping in Taï chimpanzees , 1996 .