AbstractPolymerase chain reaction (PCR) end-point limiting dilution techniques, collectively termed “digital PCR (dPCR)”, have been proposed as providing a potentially primary method for DNA quantification. We are evaluating several commercially available dPCR systems for use in certifying mass concentration in human genomic DNA reference materials. To better understand observed anomalies among results from chamber- and droplet-dPCR (cdPCR and ddPCR) systems, we have developed a graphical tool for evaluating and documenting the performance of PCR assays in real-time cdPCR systems: the ogive plot, the cumulative distribution of crossing threshold values. The ogive structure appears to embed information about early amplification events. We have successfully simulated ogives observed with different assays and reaction conditions using a four-stage amplification model parameterized by the probability of creating an intact 1) first generation “long” amplicon of indeterminate length from an original DNA target, 2) second generation defined-length amplicon from a long amplicon, and 3) defined-length amplicon from another defined-length amplicon. We are using insights from this model to optimize dPCR assay design and reaction conditions and to help validate assays proposed for use in value-assigning DNA reference materials.
Graphical AbstractCumulative distributions of crossing threshold (Ct) values for the same human genomic DNA evaluated with eight assays with a real-time chamber digital PCR platform. The shape and location of the curves (ogives) embed information about the PCR amplification process
[1]
A. Spiess,et al.
Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency.
,
2014,
Analytical biochemistry.
[2]
S H Neoh,et al.
Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution.
,
1992,
BioTechniques.
[3]
Aleš Fajgelj,et al.
Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: Concepts and implementation (IUPAC Technical Report)
,
2011
.
[4]
A. Spiess,et al.
Statistical uncertainty and its propagation in the analysis of quantitative polymerase chain reaction data: comparison of methods.
,
2014,
Analytical biochemistry.
[5]
G Stolovitzky,et al.
Efficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction.
,
1996,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[6]
J. Butler,et al.
NIST Mixed Stain Study 3: DNA quantitation accuracy and its influence on short tandem repeat multiplex signal intensity.
,
2003,
Analytical Chemistry.
[7]
R. Blakesley,et al.
Guide to the use of type II restriction endonucleases.
,
1983,
Methods in enzymology.