Letters are functional in word identification

Are words identified as if they are single-unit patterns, or does letter processing mediate word identification? In the main, accuracy experiments have been found to support the mediated model, whereas recent reaction time experiments have been interpreted in favor of the single-unit pattern hypothesis. In the latter experiments, subjects could search for a target word in a test word as quickly as for a target letter in a test letter. The analysis of these results, however, did not consider the role of parallel processing of individual letters, lateral masking, limited capacity, and similarity between the target and test alternatives. In the present experiment, the advantage of parallel processing of letters in words was attenuated by manipulating similarity. The reaction times showed a processing advantage for single letters over words. This result as well as all of the previous results can be described in terms of processing mechanisms of the mediated model, the same mechanisms that have already been utilized to describe the accuracy of letter and word identification in tachistoscopic experiments.

[1]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[2]  H. Bouma Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[3]  D. Massaro Experimental psychology and information processing , 1975 .

[4]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Primary and Secondary Recognition in Reading , 1975 .

[5]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[6]  P. A. Weaver,et al.  Theory and practice of early reading , 1979 .

[7]  J. Sloboda Decision times for word and letter search: A wholistic word identification model examined , 1976 .

[8]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Issues and Models Concerning the Processing of a Finite Number of Inputs 1 , 2021, Human Information Processing.

[9]  Patrick Groff Research in Brief: Shapes as Cues to Word Recognition. , 1975 .

[10]  Neal F. Johnson,et al.  On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model , 1975 .

[11]  R. Thouless Experimental Psychology , 1939, Nature.

[12]  L. Henderson Do words conceal their component letters? A critique of on the visual perception of words , 1975 .

[13]  K I Forster,et al.  Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[15]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[16]  H. Bouma Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[17]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  F. S. Wrinch The Time of Perception as a Measure of Differences in Intensity. , 1903 .

[19]  W. Estes,et al.  Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .

[20]  F. H. Kanfer Perception: identification and instrumental activity. , 1956, Psychological review.

[21]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[22]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .