Reproducibility of bone micro-architecture measurements in rodents by in vivo micro-computed tomography is maximized with three-dimensional image registration.

In vivo micro-computed tomography (microCT) is a new method to monitor longitudinal changes of bone micro-architecture. Common animal models of bone diseases are mice and rats, and it is important to know the reproducibility of the bone measurements in order to correctly interpret results. When performing baseline and follow-up acquisitions, variation in the scan region will influence the parameters, and it has yet to be investigated if three-dimensional (3D) registration can improve the reproducibility. Two typical breeds of mice and one typical breed of rats were scanned four times each using microCT and standard bone morphological and density measurements were calculated. Image registration was used to find the overlapping regions between the scans within each series of animal data and only overlapping regions were analyzed for the bone parameters. Reproducibility was determined for each animal both pre- and post-registration. For the rats, results included a bone volume ratio (BV/TV) precision error of 5.46%, cortical thickness (Ct.Th) error of 1.97%, and tissue mineral density (TMD) of 2.00%. For the BL6 mice, precision errors were 3.00% (BV/TV), 0.95% (Ct.Th), and 0.94% (TMD), and for the C3H mice 2.68% (BV/TV), 1.52% (Ct.Th), and 1.72% (TMD). After image registration there was a significant improvement in reproducibility in most parameters for the rats. In general, metric parameters such as bone volume ratio had better reproducibility than the non-metric parameters connectivity density and structure model index. With 3D registration, reproducibility improved the results obtained by the experienced operators in this study. Registration may serve to equalize reproducibility of operators with different skill levels and across laboratories. It also improves efficiency by reducing the amount of hand-contouring required. This reproducibility data will be important for the interpretation of current and future longitudinal microCT studies.

[1]  Laurence Vico,et al.  Noninvasive In Vivo Monitoring of Bone Architecture Alterations in Hindlimb‐Unloaded Female Rats Using Novel Three‐Dimensional Microcomputed Tomography , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  S. Goodman,et al.  Mouse femoral intramedullary injection model: technique and microCT scan validation. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[5]  H. Weinans,et al.  Imaging of experimental osteoarthritis in small animal models. , 2008, Biorheology.

[6]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis. , 2007, Bone.

[7]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Monitoring individual morphological changes over time in ovariectomized rats by in vivo micro-computed tomography. , 2006, Bone.

[8]  Bert van Rietbergen,et al.  Influence of Early and Late Zoledronic Acid Administration on Vertebral Structure and Strength in Ovariectomized Rats , 2008, Calcified Tissue International.

[9]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Precision of high-resolution dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of bone mineral status and body composition in small animal models. , 2001, European cells & materials.

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  H Weinans,et al.  Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. , 2004, Bone.

[12]  L. Donahue,et al.  Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. , 1996, Bone.

[13]  Julienne E. M. Brouwers,et al.  Determination of rat vertebral bone compressive fatigue properties in untreated intact rats and zoledronic-acid-treated, ovariectomized rats , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  S. K. Boyd,et al.  Signs of irreversible architectural changes occur early in the development of experimental osteoporosis as assessed by in vivo micro-CT , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  David W Holdsworth,et al.  In vivo micro-CT analysis of bone remodeling in a rat calvarial defect model , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Improved reproducibility of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Evaluation of Three-dimensional Image Registration Methodologies for In Vivo Micro-computed Tomography , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  S. Boyd,et al.  The Magnitude and Rate of Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Mice Differs Among Inbred Strains as Determined by Longitudinal In vivo Micro-Computed Tomography , 2008, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  R. Müller,et al.  Compartmental Bone Morphometry in the Mouse Femur: Reproducibility and Resolution Dependence of Microtomographic Measurements , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  H. Genant,et al.  Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. , 2000, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[21]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  H. Weinans,et al.  In vivo imaging of cartilage degeneration using microCT-arthrography. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[23]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Precision, accuracy, and reproducibility of dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in mice in vivo. , 2003, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[24]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Radiation effects on bone architecture in mice and rats resulting from in vivo micro-computed tomography scanning. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  TOR Hildebrand,et al.  Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[27]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Precision and Accuracy of Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) in the Mouse Skeleton Compared With Histology and Microcomputed Tomography (μCT) , 2003 .

[28]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  G. H. van Lenthe,et al.  Non-invasive bone competence analysis by high-resolution pQCT: an in vitro reproducibility study on structural and mechanical properties at the human radius. , 2009, Bone.

[30]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models. , 2007, Bone.

[31]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  Significance Tests for Coefficients of Variation and Variability Profiles , 1980 .