A new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity

We have developed a new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm, the RSM-MREIT algorithm, for noninvasive imaging of the electrical conductivity distribution using only one component of magnetic flux density. The proposed RSM-MREIT algorithm uses the response surface methodology (RSM) algorithm for optimizing the conductivity distribution through minimizing the errors between the measured and calculated magnetic flux densities. A series of computer simulations has been conducted to assess the performance of the proposed RSM-MREIT algorithm to estimate electrical conductivity values of the scalp, the skull and the brain tissue, in a three-shell piecewise homogeneous head model. Computer simulation studies were conducted in both a spherical and realistic-geometry head model with a single variable (the brain-to-skull conductivity ratio) and three variables (the conductivity of the brain, the skull, and the scalp). The relative error between the target and estimated head conductivity values was less than 12% for both the single-variable and three-variable simulations. These promising simulation results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed RSM-MREIT algorithm in estimating electrical conductivity values in a piecewise homogeneous head model of the human head, and suggest that the RSM-MREIT algorithm merits further investigation.

[1]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  Electrical conductivity imaging using gradient Bz decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) , 2004, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Byung Il Lee,et al.  Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J. Gati,et al.  Imaging of current density and current pathways in rabbit brain during transcranial electrostimulation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and Novelty P3 components , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Y Ziya Ider,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction for 3D magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using one component of magnetic flux density. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Byung Il Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Byung Il Lee,et al.  J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  B Murat Eyüboğlu,et al.  Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Bin He,et al.  Estimation of electrical conductivity distribution within the human head from magnetic flux density measurement. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Bin He,et al.  Modeling and imaging of bioelectrical activity : principles and applications , 2004 .

[11]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Yusuf Ziya Ider,et al.  Measurement of AC magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  M. Joy,et al.  In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  John S. Leigh,et al.  Imaging Electrical Current Density Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1998 .

[16]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Optimization via simulation: A review , 1994, Ann. Oper. Res..

[18]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J. Sneddon Sequential simplex optimization , 1992 .

[20]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[21]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[22]  Y. Z. Ider,et al.  Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Bin He,et al.  Boundary Element Method-Based Cortical Potential Imaging of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Using Subjects' Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  Bin He,et al.  Estimating cortical potentials from scalp EEG's in a realistically shaped inhomogeneous head model by means of the boundary element method. , 1999, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[25]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging , 1992 .

[26]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  On a Nonlinear Partial Differential Equation Arising in Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2002, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[27]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Nature.

[28]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization , 2004 .

[29]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[30]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .