Air traffic controller decision-making support using the solution space diagram

Abstract Air traffic controller workload is considered to be one of the most important limiting factors to the growth of air traffic. The difficulty of a traffic control task can be analyzed through examining the problem's solution space, i.e., all possible vector commands that satisfy the various constraints. But apart from deriving metrics for workload, a visualization based on the solution space, resulting in the Solution Space Diagram, could also serve as an aid for alleviating controller workload. An experiment was conducted in which different levels of traffic were tested in order to evaluate the capabilities of the Solution Space diagram. The experiment entailed the task of merging aircraft into a single route and subjects provided subjective ratings of workload at fixed intervals of time. Depending on traffic level, significant effects of the Solution Space diagram were found on the reduction of controller workload.

[1]  René van Paassen,et al.  Ecological Interface Design of a Tactical Airborne Separation Assistance Tool , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[2]  William S. Pawlak,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPLEXITY , 1996 .

[3]  Anthony J. Masalonis,et al.  DYNAMIC DENSITY AND COMPLEXITY METRICS FOR REALTIME TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[4]  Crutchfield Jerry,et al.  Predicting Subjective Workload Ratings: A Comparison and Synthesis of Operational and Theoretical Models , 2007 .

[5]  A J Tattersall,et al.  An experimental evaluation of instantaneous self-assessment as a measure of workload. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[6]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  En-Route Sector Capacity Estimation Methodologies: An International Survey , 2005 .

[7]  G. B. Chatterji,et al.  Neural network based air traffic controller workload prediction , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[8]  Jean-Pierre Nicolaon,et al.  The Tactical Load Smoother for Multi-Sector Planning , 1998 .

[9]  M R Phillips,et al.  The validation of fast-time air traffic simulations in practice , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Parimal Kopardekar,et al.  Controller Workload Analysis Methodology to Predict Increases in Airspace Capacity , 2003 .

[11]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Introducing Structural Considerations into Complexity Metrics , 2001 .

[12]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  The Use of the Dynamic Solution Space to Assess Air Traffic Controller Workload , 2010 .

[13]  S. Puechmorel,et al.  Air Traffic Complexity: Towards an Intrinsic Metric , 2000 .

[14]  John W. Polak,et al.  Estimating Capacity of Europe’s Airspace Using a Simulation Model of Air Traffic Controller Workload , 2001 .

[15]  Max Mulder,et al.  Analysis of Air Traffic Controller Workload Reduction Based on the Solution Space for the Merging Task , 2010 .

[16]  Max Mulder,et al.  Solution-Space-Based Complexity Analysis of the Difficulty of Aircraft Merging Tasks , 2009 .

[17]  Brian Hilburn,et al.  COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[18]  Amy R. Pritchett,et al.  Describing Airspace Complexity: Airspace Response to Disturbances , 2009 .

[19]  M. Mulder,et al.  The Concept of the ‘Situation” in Psychology , 2004 .