The Arctic response to remote and local forcing of black carbon

Recent studies suggest that the Arctic temperature response to black carbon (BC) forcing depend strongly on the location of the forcing. We investigate how atmospheric BC in the mid-latitudes remotely influence the Arctic climate, and compare this with the response to atmospheric BC located in the Arctic itself. In this study, idealized climate simulations are carried out with a fully coupled Earth System Model, which includes a comprehensive treatment of aerosol microphysics. In order to determine how BC transported to the Arctic and BC sources not reaching the Arctic impact the Arctic climate, atmospheric BC concentrations are scaled up in the mid-latitudes (28–60° N) and in the Arctic (60–90° N), respectively. Estimates of the impact on the Arctic energy budget are represented by analyzing radiation fluxes at the top of the atmosphere and at the surface, surface turbulent fluxes, and meridional heat transport in the atmosphere. Our calculations show that increased BC forcing in the Arctic atmosphere reduces the surface air temperature in the Arctic with a corresponding increase in the sea-ice fraction, despite the increased planetary absorption of sunlight. The analysis indicates that this effect is due to a combination of a weakening of the northward heat transport caused by a reduction in the meridional temperature gradient and a dimming at the surface. On the other hand we find that BC forcing at the mid-latitudes warms the Arctic surface significantly and decreases the sea-ice fraction. Our model calculations indicate that atmospheric BC forcing outside the Arctic may be more important for the Arctic climate change than the forcing in the Arctic itself. These results suggest that mitigation strategies for the Arctic climate should also address BC sources in locations outside the Arctic even if they do not contribute much to BC in the Arctic.

[1]  T. Diehl,et al.  Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty , 2012 .

[2]  Corinna Hoose,et al.  The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M - Part 1: Description and basic evaluation , 2012 .

[3]  Ivar A. Seierstad,et al.  The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections , 2012 .

[4]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Aerosol–climate interactions in the Norwegian Earth System Model – NorESM1-M , 2012 .

[5]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Influence of Local Feedbacks and Northward Heat Transport on the Equilibrium Arctic Climate Response to Increased Greenhouse Gas Forcing , 2012 .

[6]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators , 2012 .

[7]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[8]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Observationally constrained estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Recent Northern Hemisphere tropical expansion primarily driven by black carbon and tropospheric ozone , 2012, Nature.

[10]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[11]  J. Kay,et al.  A Characterization of the Present-Day Arctic Atmosphere in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[12]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security , 2012, Science.

[13]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Dependence of climate forcing and response on the altitude of black carbon aerosols , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[14]  B. Samset,et al.  Vertical dependence of black carbon, sulphate and biomass burning aerosol radiative forcing , 2011 .

[15]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Parameterization of black carbon aging in the OsloCTM2 and implications for regional transport to the Arctic , 2011 .

[16]  J. Kay,et al.  Coupling between Arctic feedbacks and changes in poleward energy transport , 2011 .

[17]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Evaluation of factors controlling long‐range transport of black carbon to the Arctic , 2010 .

[18]  D. Koch,et al.  Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: review and synthesis , 2010 .

[19]  S. Bauer,et al.  A global modeling study on carbonaceous aerosol microphysical characteristics and radiative effects , 2010 .

[20]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[21]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle , 2010 .

[22]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Short-term effects of controlling fossil-fuel soot, biofuel soot and gases, and methane on climate, Arctic ice, and air pollution health , 2010 .

[23]  D. F. Porter,et al.  New estimates of the large-scale Arctic atmospheric energy budget , 2010 .

[24]  D. Koch,et al.  Black carbon semidirect effects on cloud cover : review and synthesis , 2010 .

[25]  M. Chin,et al.  Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .

[26]  Nils Gunnar Kvamstø,et al.  Simulated pre-industrial climate in Bergen Climate Model (version 2): model description and large-scale circulation features , 2009 .

[27]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Cloud influence on and response to seasonal Arctic sea ice loss , 2009 .

[28]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Distinguishing Aerosol Impacts on Climate over the Past Century , 2009 .

[29]  Drew T. Shindell,et al.  Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century , 2009 .

[30]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect , 2009 .

[31]  A. Kleidon.  Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in the Earth system , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[32]  K. Eleftheriadis,et al.  Aerosol black carbon in the European Arctic: Measurements at Zeppelin station, Ny‐Ålesund, Svalbard from 1998–2007 , 2009 .

[33]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  Modeling of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process—implications for aerosol indirect effects , 2008 .

[34]  Mian Chin,et al.  A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic , 2008 .

[35]  Kirsten L. Findell,et al.  Strong sensitivity of late 21st century climate to projected changes in short-lived air pollutants , 2008 .

[36]  Trude Storelvmo,et al.  Aerosol-cloud-climate interactions in the climate model CAM-Oslo , 2008 .

[37]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  Aerosol-climate interactions in the CAM-Oslo atmospheric GCM and investigation of associated basic shortcomings , 2008 .

[38]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[39]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[40]  D. Shindell.  Local and remote contributions to Arctic warming , 2007 .

[41]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts , 2007, Science.

[42]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow , 2006 .

[43]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[44]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic smoke – record high air pollution levels in the European Arctic due to agricultural fires in Eastern Europe in spring 2006 , 2006 .

[45]  L. Barrie,et al.  Variations and sources of the equivalent black carbon in the high Arctic revealed by long‐term observations at Alert and Barrow: 1989–2003 , 2006 .

[46]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[47]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Climate response of direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic black carbon , 2005 .

[48]  G. Danabasoglu,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 4 , 2011 .

[49]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  The semi‐direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus , 2004 .

[50]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[51]  J. Hansen,et al.  Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  T. Iversen,et al.  Correction to “A scheme for process-tagged SO4 and BC aerosols in NCAR-CCM3: Validation and sensitivity to cloud processes” , 2003 .

[53]  H. Drange,et al.  Description and evaluation of the bergen climate model: ARPEGE coupled with MICOM , 2003 .

[54]  G. Boer,et al.  Climate sensitivity and response , 2003 .

[55]  T. Iversen,et al.  A scheme for process‐tagged SO4 and BC aerosols in NCAR CCM3: Validation and sensitivity to cloud processes , 2002 .

[56]  J. Hansen,et al.  Climate Effects of Black Carbon Aerosols in China and India , 2002, Science.

[57]  Jón Egill Kristjánsson,et al.  Studies of the aerosol indirect effect from sulfate and black carbon aerosols , 2002 .

[58]  E. Feil,et al.  Climate Effects of Black Carbon Aerosols in China and India , 2002 .

[59]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[61]  R. Pueschel,et al.  Physical and Radiative Properties of Arctic Atmospheric Aerosols , 1995 .

[62]  B. Hoskins.  Towards a PV- θ view of the general circulation , 1991 .

[63]  B. Albrecht.  Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[64]  G. Shaw.  Arctic air pollution , 1988 .

[65]  L. Barrie,et al.  Arctic air pollution: An overview of current knowledge , 1986 .

[66]  S. Twomey.  The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .