EEG-Based Classification of Imagined Arm Trajectories

A brain-computer interface (BCI) in combination with a neuroprosthesis can be used to restore movement functionalities in paralyzed persons. The BCI detects the movement imagination (MI) and the neuroprosthesis transforms it into a real movement. Today’s BCIs can detect the process of MI, but not the actual imagined trajectories of, e.g., the arm. Users’ control of a BCI would become more intuitive and natural when the detailed MI, i.e., trajectories, are detected. This is called movement decoding. We made a first attempt to decode MIs, and notably, we did not provoke task depended artefacts like eye movements in our paradigm design. However, that made it necessary to restrict the MIs to movements in two orthogonal planes. We classified the movement plane using a decoding method. For this purpose, we decoded the imagined trajectory and correlated it with two assumed movement trajectories, and then assigned the MI to the assumed movement with the higher correlation. That way, we reached a significant classification accuracy in 7 out of 9 subjects, and showed indirectly the decoding of imagined movements.

[1]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Decoding of velocities and positions of 3D arm movement from EEG , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Z. Gu,et al.  Decoding hand movement velocity from electroencephalogram signals during a drawing task , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Comment on 'fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals'. , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Listening to rhythms activates motor and premotor cortices , 2009, Cortex.

[6]  Vera Kaiser,et al.  Hybrid brain-computer interfaces and hybrid neuroprostheses for restoration of upper limb functions in individuals with high-level spinal cord injury , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[8]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[9]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[10]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Reconstructing Three-Dimensional Hand Movements from Noninvasive Electroencephalographic Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Is It Significant? Guidelines for Reporting BCI Performance , 2012 .

[13]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Towards Practical Brain-Computer Interfaces: Bridging the Gap from Research to Real-World Applications , 2012 .

[14]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Donald Eugene. Farrar,et al.  Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis; the Problem Revisited , 2011 .

[16]  Matthew Brett,et al.  Rhythm and Beat Perception in Motor Areas of the Brain , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: A step towards clinical practice , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  ‘Thought’ – control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[20]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.