Trophically Unique Species Are Vulnerable to Cascading Extinction

Understanding which species might become extinct and the consequences of such loss is critical. One consequence is a cascade of further, secondary extinctions. While a significant amount is known about the types of communities and species that suffer secondary extinctions, little is known about the consequences of secondary extinctions for biodiversity. Here we examine the effect of these secondary extinctions on trophic diversity, the range of trophic roles played by the species in a community. Our analyses of natural and model food webs show that secondary extinctions cause loss of trophic diversity greater than that expected from chance, a result that is robust to variation in food web structure, distribution of interactions strengths, functional response, and adaptive foraging. Greater than expected loss of trophic diversity occurs because more trophically unique species are more vulnerable to secondary extinction. This is not a straightforward consequence of these species having few links with others but is a complex function of how direct and indirect interactions affect species persistence. A positive correlation between a species’ extinction probability and the importance of its loss defines high‐risk species and should make their conservation a priority.

[1]  Annie Jonsson,et al.  Food web structure affects the extinction risk of species in ecological communities , 2006 .

[2]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Local trophodynamics and the interaction of marine mammals and fisheries in the Benguela ecosystem , 1998 .

[3]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[4]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Anne-Béatrice Dufour,et al.  Is the originality of a species measurable , 2005 .

[6]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Cascading extinctions and ecosystem functioning: contrasting effects of diversity depending on food web structure , 2007 .

[7]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[8]  R M May,et al.  Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 1997, Science.

[9]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks , 2005 .

[10]  Tomas Jonsson,et al.  Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs , 2000 .

[11]  R. Paine,et al.  Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength , 1992, Nature.

[12]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  B. Worm,et al.  Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs , 2003 .

[14]  R. Sokal,et al.  THE COMPARISON OF DENDROGRAMS BY OBJECTIVE METHODS , 1962 .

[15]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Species loss and the structure and functioning of multitrophic aquatic systems , 2004 .

[16]  Anna Eklöf,et al.  Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  K. Gross,et al.  The functional consequences of random vs. ordered species extinctions , 2005 .

[18]  B. Ebenman,et al.  COMMUNITY VIABILITY ANALYSIS: THE RESPONSE OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES TO SPECIES LOSS , 2004 .

[19]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[20]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. , 2000, Science.

[22]  J. Fox,et al.  Stability and complexity in microcosm communities , 2002 .

[23]  C. Quince,et al.  Deleting species from model food webs , 2004, q-bio/0401037.

[24]  B. Ebenman,et al.  Using community viability analysis to identify fragile systems and keystone species. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[26]  D.SC. PH.D. F.R.S. T. R. E. Southwood Kt Ecological Methods , 1978, Springer Netherlands.

[27]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  Food web design and the effect of species deletion , 1980 .

[28]  T. Williams,et al.  Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: An ongoing legacy of industrial whaling? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems , 2007, Science.

[30]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Extinction and the loss of functional diversity , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Jerry C. Blackford,et al.  Self-assembling food webs : a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka-Volterra communities , 1992 .

[32]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[33]  P. Yodzis The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[34]  P. Yodzis,et al.  In search of operational trophospecies in a tropical aquatic food web , 1999 .

[35]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[36]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Species Coextinctions and the Biodiversity Crisis , 2004, Science.

[37]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[38]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[39]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[40]  B. Ebenman,et al.  Keystone species and vulnerable species in ecological communities: strong or weak interactors? , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  M. Emmerson,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION STRENGTH IN NATURE , 2005 .

[42]  S. Naeem,et al.  Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem , 2003 .

[43]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Species Loss and Aboveground Carbon Storage in a Tropical Forest , 2005, Science.

[44]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[45]  Bo Ebenman,et al.  Early onset of secondary extinctions in ecological communities following the loss of top predators. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[46]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.