Current deformation and the width of the seismogenic zone of the northern Cascadia subduction thrust

Evidence has been obtained for the accumulation of elastic strain across the northern Cascadia subduction zone that may be released in a future very large subduction thrust earthquake. Vertical and horizontal strain rates across the southern Vancouver Island region have been determined through (1) long-term trends in tide gauge data, (2) changes in repeated accurate leveling surveys, (3) changes in repeated high-accuracy gravity profiles, and (4) horizontal shortening observed in repeated precise positioning surveys. The outer coast is uplifting at a rate of a few millimeters per year decreasing landward, and shortening is occurring across the 100-km-wide coastal region at a rate of about 0.1 microstrain per year (mm km−1yr−1). The results are compared with the distribution of strain accumulation predicted from elastic dislocation and viscoelastic models for a subduction thrust fault. The location of the fault as used in the models is well defined by multichannel seismic reflection and other geophysical data. Most of the observed current deformation can be explained by interseismic strain accumulation associated with the subduction thrust of southern Vancouver Island and northern Washington, provided the locked portion is restricted to a 60-km-wide band offshore beneath the continental shelf and slope. This conclusion also results from modeling the coseismic subsidence on the outer coast of Vancouver Island about 300 years ago deduced from paleoseismicity data. The unusually narrow downdip extent of the subduction thrust seismogenic zone, that extends little if at all beneath the coast, is a consequence of high temperatures associated with the young age of the subducted oceanic lithosphere and the thick blanket of insulating sediments. The high temperatures limit brittle seismogenic behavior downdip to where the thrust fault is at a depth of less than 15 km. The distance from the seismic portion of the megathrust limits the estimated ground motion at the major centers of Vancouver and Victoria from this source. The narrow width may also limit the earthquake size; however, events of magnitude well over 8 are possible.

[1]  Jack Oliver,et al.  Vertical crustal movements from leveling data and their relation to geologic structure in the eastern United States , 1976 .

[2]  D. Chelton,et al.  Ocean signals in tide gauge records , 1986 .

[3]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[4]  D. E. Smylie,et al.  The displacement fields of inclined faults , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  R. Hyndman,et al.  Seismicity and rates of relative motion on the plate boundaries of Western North America , 1983 .

[6]  B. F. Atwater.  Geologic evidence for earthquakes during the past 2000 years along the Copalis River, southern coastal Washington , 1992 .

[7]  J. Rundle,et al.  A viscoelastic coupling model for the cyclic deformation due to periodically repeated Earthquakes at subduction zones , 1984 .

[8]  J. Clague,et al.  Late Quaternary sea levels and crustal movements, coastal British Columbia , 1982 .

[9]  R. Clowes,et al.  Seismic structure across the active subduction zone of western Canada , 1985 .

[10]  M. Darienzo,et al.  Episodic tectonic subsidence of Late Holocene salt marshes, northern Oregon Central Cascadia Margin , 1990 .

[11]  P. Friele,et al.  Holocene sea-level change on the central west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia , 1993 .

[12]  D. F. Barnes.  Gravity changes during the Alaska earthquake , 1966 .

[13]  John R. Rice,et al.  Local changes in gravity resulting from deformation , 1979 .

[14]  Stephen H. Hartzell,et al.  INVERSION FOR SLIP DISTRIBUTION USING TELESEISMIC P WAVEFORMS: NORTH PALM SPRINGS, BORAH PEAK, AND MICHOACAN EARTHQUAKES , 1988 .

[15]  R. Hyndman,et al.  Canada's Active Western Margin: The Case for Subduction , 1976 .

[16]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Thermal constraints on the zone of major thrust earthquake failure: The Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1993 .

[17]  L. B. Freund,et al.  A two-dimensional analysis of surface deformation due to dip-slip faulting , 1976 .

[18]  John B. Adams,et al.  Geodetic evidence for active landward tilting of the Oregon and Washington Coastal Ranges , 1982 .

[19]  D. Fisher,et al.  Evidence for a weak and overpressured décollement beneath sediment‐dominated accretionary prisms , 1990 .

[20]  Static deformation of a uniform half-space due to a long dip-slip fault , 1992 .

[21]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismic coupling and uncoupling at subduction zones , 1983 .

[22]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Source characteristics of hypothetical subduction earthquakes in the northwestern United States , 1986 .

[23]  Emery I. Balazs,et al.  Geodetic evidence for aseismic subduction of the Juan de Fuca Plate , 1979 .

[24]  R. Hyndman,et al.  Accretion and recent deformation of sediments along the northern Cascadia subduction zone , 1989 .

[25]  Petr Vaníček,et al.  Geodetic leveling and its applications , 1980 .

[26]  H. Melosh,et al.  Anelastic response of the earth to a dip slip earthquake , 1983 .

[27]  G. Plafker,et al.  Postseismic coastal uplift in southern Chile , 1992 .

[28]  J. C. Savage.  Local gravity anomalies produced by dislocation sources , 1984 .

[29]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Strain accumulation in western Washington , 1991 .

[30]  E. Davis,et al.  On the cause of the asymmetric distribution of seamounts about the Juan de Fuca ridge: ridge-crest migration over a heterogeneous asthenosphere , 1986 .

[31]  G. Rogers.  Seismic potential of the Cascadia subduction zone , 1988, Nature.

[32]  L. Sykes,et al.  Loci and maximum size of thrust earthquakes and the mechanics of the shallow region of subduction zones , 1988 .

[33]  W. Peltier,et al.  Global Sea Level Rise and the Greenhouse Effect: Might They Be Connected? , 1989, Science.

[34]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Interseismic deformation at the Nankai Trough, Japan, subduction zone , 1992 .

[35]  M. E. Mackay,et al.  Landward vergence and oblique structural trends in the Oregon margin accretionary prism: Implications and effect on fluid flow , 1992 .

[36]  J. Whitcomb.  New vertical geodesy , 1976 .

[37]  H. Dragert,et al.  Crustal Deformation Measurements on Vancouver Island, British Columbia: 1976 to 1988 , 1990 .

[38]  H. Dragert.  The fall (and rise) of central Vancouver Island: 1930–1985 , 1987 .

[39]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Tide gage measurements of uplift along the south coast of Alaska , 1991 .

[40]  T. J. Owens,et al.  Slab geometry of the Cascadia Subduction Zone beneath Washington from earthquake hypocenters and tel , 1987 .

[41]  G. Carver,et al.  Late Holocene Tectonics and Paleoseismicity, Southern Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1992, Science.

[42]  Toshinori Sato,et al.  Cyclic crustal movement, steady uplift of marine terraces, and evolution of the island arc-trench system in southwest Japan , 1992 .

[43]  R. Hyndman,et al.  The Nootka Fault Zone — a new plate boundary off western Canada , 1979 .

[44]  L. Ruff,et al.  Seismic coupling along the Chilean Subduction Zone , 1991 .

[45]  Garry C. Rogers,et al.  An assessment of the megathrust earthquake potential of the Cascadia subduction zone , 1988 .

[46]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Tectonic sediment thickening, fluid expulsion, and the thermal regime of subduction zone accretionary prisms: The Cascadia Margin off Vancouver Island , 1993 .

[47]  L. Simarski.  EOS scrutinized again , 1991 .

[48]  Alfred Kleusberg,et al.  Establishment of crustal deformation networks using gps: a case study , 1988 .

[49]  R. Riddihough.  Contemporary movements and tectonics on Canada's west coast: A discussion , 1982 .

[50]  R. Hyndman,et al.  Regional Geophysics and Structural Framework of the Vancouver Island Margin Accretionary Prism , 1994 .

[51]  R. Thiessen,et al.  Three-dimensional model of the Cascadia subduction zone using earthquake hypocenters, western Washington , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[52]  H. Acharya.  Comparison of seismicity parameters in different subduction zones and its implications for the Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1992 .

[53]  G. Rogers,et al.  A second look at the British Columbia earthquake of June 23, 1946 , 1978 .

[54]  R. Riddihough.  Recent movements of the Juan de Fuca Plate System , 1984 .

[55]  H. Dragert,et al.  Repeated precise gravity measurements on Vancouver Island, British Columbia , 1981 .

[56]  W. Thatcher.  The earthquake deformation cycle at the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan , 1984 .

[57]  T. Heaton.  The calm before the quake? , 1990, Nature.

[58]  William D. Stuart,et al.  Forecast model for great earthquakes at the Nankai Trough subduction zone , 1988 .

[59]  R. Snay,et al.  Horizontal deformation in the Cascadia subduction zone as derived from serendipitous geodetic data , 1991 .

[60]  H. Villinger,et al.  Rates of fluid expulsion across the Northern Cascadia Accretionary Prism: Constraints from new heat row and multichannel seismic reflection data , 1990 .

[61]  G. Rogers,et al.  The 1918 and 1957 Vancouver Island earthquakes , 1988 .

[62]  W. Peltier,et al.  ICE-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of po , 1991 .

[63]  R. Hyndman,et al.  The northern Cascadia subduction zone at Vancouver Island: seismic structure and tectonic history , 1990 .

[64]  J. C. Savage.  A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone , 1983 .

[65]  John Adams,et al.  Active deformation of the Pacific Northwest Continental Margin , 1984 .

[66]  Bruce C. Douglas,et al.  Global sea level rise , 1991 .

[67]  S. Hicks.  An average geopotential sea-level series for the United States. , 1978 .

[68]  R. Huene,et al.  OBSERVATIONS AT CONVERGENT MARGINS CONCERNING SEDIMENT SUBDUCTION, SUBDUCTION EROSION, AND THE GROWTH , 1991 .

[69]  John Adams,et al.  Paleoseismicity of the Cascadia Subduction Zone: Evidence from turbidites off the Oregon‐Washington Margin , 1990 .

[70]  M. Langseth,et al.  Fluids in accretionary prisms , 1990 .