ACOUSTIC AND ILLUMINATION DESIGN OF CONFERENCE ROOMS

The conference room is one of the most important venues for corporations, governments, and schools. The conference room is the place where, among other things, designs are presented and sold, contracts are negotiated and signed, and executives hold meetings and develop corporate policy. While a properly designed conference room is rarely noticed, a poorly designed conference room is always noticed. Whether communication is truly hindered or occupants are merely distracted, a poorly designed conference room will have a negative impact on the business taking place in the room. Since the main form of communication in nearly all conference rooms is aural, the acoustic design of conference rooms is paramount and should not be considered less important than the overall aesthetic concept of the architect. Since the second most important form of communication comes in the form of visuals, proper illumination design is also important. The acoustic goals can usually be met by ensuring that the background noise level is below 38 dBA, the 1 kHz reverberation time is under 0.5 seconds and that reverberation times in other bands are controlled, that flutter echoes are avoided, and that the composite STC of the walls is at least 50. The lighting goals can usually be met by ensuring that the horizontal illuminance on the table is 60-100 fc, the vertical illuminance on the walls is 45-60 fc, the ratio of horizontal to vertical illuminance at the occupant position is about 1.6, and the maximum luminance is under 250 fL. In addition, all lighting systems should have dimming controls.

[1]  S. K. Tang Performance of noise indices in air-conditioned landscaped office buildings. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility under Different Lighting Conditions , 2001 .

[3]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J S Bradley,et al.  On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. K. Tang,et al.  Performance of noise indices in office environment dominated by noise from human speech , 1998 .

[6]  David John MacKenzie,et al.  Speech Intelligibility in classrooms , 1996 .

[7]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  Lighting quality recommendations for VDT offices: a new method of derivation , 2001 .

[8]  Lois Thibault,et al.  Implementation of ANSI S12.60 acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools , 2001 .

[9]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Rating, ranking, and understanding acoustical quality in university classrooms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Relating speech intelligibility to useful-to-detrimental sound ratios. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. S. Bradley Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Veitch Psychological Processes Influencing Lighting Quality , 2001 .

[13]  Francesco Martellotta,et al.  A new approach to assessing the performance of noise indices in buildings , 2003 .

[14]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance , 1998 .

[15]  Murray Hodgson Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms , 1999 .

[16]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures , 1999 .