Origin of the bell-like dependence of the DPOAE amplitude on primary frequency ratio.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P Dallos,et al. Nonlinearities in cochlear receptor potentials and their origins. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] S. Neely,et al. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] J. Wable,et al. Phase delay measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 in human ears. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] G. Manley,et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea , 2001, Hearing Research.
[5] M P Gorga,et al. Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Edwin W Rubel,et al. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection , 1994, Hearing Research.
[7] I. Russell,et al. The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1−f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a secondary generator , 1998 .
[9] A. M. Brown,et al. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] David T. Kemp,et al. Suppressibility of the 2 f 1- f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man , 1984, Hearing Research.
[12] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] D. Mills,et al. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] P. Fahey,et al. Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] A. M. Brown,et al. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] H. Wada,et al. Effect of anesthetic agents and middle ear pressure application on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the gerbil , 1997, Hearing Research.
[19] I. Russell,et al. A descriptive model of the receptor potential nonlinearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] A. Moulin,et al. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Manfred Kössl,et al. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2−f1 and 2f1−f2 , 1997, Hearing Research.
[22] Manfred Kössl,et al. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier , 1996, Hearing Research.
[23] C. Abdala. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] D T Kemp,et al. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] P Dallos,et al. Intracellular recordings from cochlear outer hair cells. , 1982, Science.
[26] M G Evans,et al. Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.
[27] R. A. Schmiedt,et al. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] R. Schoonhoven,et al. Amplitude of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig in f 1- and f 2-sweep paradigms , 2001, Hearing Research.
[29] I. Russell,et al. Analysis of the f2−f1 and 2 f1−f2 distortion components generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer: Dependence on the amplitudes of the primaries and feedback gain , 1999 .
[30] J. Allen,et al. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] A. M. Brown,et al. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[32] Peter Dallos,et al. Neurobiology of cochlear inner and outer hair cells: intracellular recordings , 1986, Hearing Research.
[33] E. Rubel,et al. Development of distortion product emissions in the gerbil: "filter" response and signal delay. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] K. Parham,et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss , 1997, Hearing Research.
[35] J. Allen,et al. Measurement of distortion product phase in the ear canal of the cat. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] M. Whitehead,et al. Species differences of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: comment on "Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 413-429 (1997)]. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] A. Cody,et al. The response of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea‐pig cochlea to tones. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.
[38] Thomas Janssen,et al. Optimal L 1−L 2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans , 2000, Hearing Research.
[39] D T Kemp,et al. Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. II. Implications for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] P M Zurek,et al. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.