Knowledge-sharing motivations affecting R&D employees' acceptance of electronic knowledge repository

Why would R&D employees be willing to use an electronic knowledge repository (EKR) for knowledge-sharing? This study integrates a technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate the influence of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on R&D employees' acceptance of an EKR for knowledge-sharing. Empirical data were collected through a survey, which gathered data from 225 employees working in 10 organisations in Taiwan. The results indicated that (1) reputation and reciprocity were found to be two important antecedents to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use; (2) altruism was also found to be an important antecedent to perceived ease of use; (3) reputation was the most influential factor of perceived usefulness, and another influential factor of perceived usefulness was reciprocity. Three knowledge-sharing motivations that significantly affect the perceived ease of use were listed as reciprocity, altruism, and reputation, according to the relative importance; (4) altruism plays an important role in explaining the EKR usage intentions for knowledge-sharing both directly and indirectly; and (5) the results were consistent with the propositions of TAM. This study contributes theoretically and empirically to the body of EKR usage research and also has practical implications.

[1]  Jung-Yu Lai,et al.  How Knowledge Map and Personalization Affect Effectiveness of KMS in High-Tech Firms , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[2]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[3]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[4]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation , 2000 .

[5]  M. Lindvall,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering , 2002, IEEE Software.

[6]  Cesar Augusto Tacla,et al.  Agent-supported portals and knowledge management in complex R&D projects , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[8]  P. Gibbins.  Fourth-generation R&D , 1997 .

[9]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Effect of Social Context on the Success of Knowledge Repository Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[16]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Brian J. Loasby.  Building systems , 2012 .

[20]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management , 2000 .

[22]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing , 2005 .

[23]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Yulin Fang,et al.  The role of trust in promoting organizational knowledge seeking using knowledge management systems: An empirical investigation , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Knowledge management system for fourth generation R&D: KNOWVATION , 2006 .

[27]  Joon Koh,et al.  A contingent approach on knowledge portal design for R&D teams: Relative importance of knowledge portal functionalities , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1 , 1980 .

[29]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Special Issue on: Knowledge Management in Asia Understanding Seeking from Electronic Knowledge Repositories: , 2022 .

[30]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[31]  Langdon Morris,et al.  Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation , 1999 .

[32]  Chang Liu,et al.  Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Alexandra Durcikova,et al.  The Role of Knowledge Repositories in Technical Support Environments: Speed Versus Learning in User Performance , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[36]  William H. Money,et al.  Assessing Knowledge Management System User Acceptance with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[37]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[38]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Clarifying the Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Gender, and Knowledge Sharing in Workplace Organizations in Taiwan , 2008 .

[39]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. , 1975 .

[40]  Tung-Ching Lin,et al.  Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[42]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[43]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Mechanisms in Industrial Research , 2006 .

[44]  David Horton Smith,et al.  Altruism, Volunteers, and Volunteerism , 1981 .

[45]  Mark N. Wexler,et al.  The who, what and why of knowledge mapping , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  D Krebs.  Empathy and altruism. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[48]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[49]  K. Hewett,et al.  A Multi-Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse , 2006 .

[50]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Building systems that users want to use , 2004, CACM.

[52]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[53]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  C. Anumba,et al.  Knowledge Management in UK Construction: Strategies, Resources and Barriers , 2004 .

[55]  Arnold Kamis,et al.  Using an Attribute-Based Decision Support System for User-Customized Products Online: An Experimental Investigation , 2008, MIS Q..

[56]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[57]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[58]  Jonathan Matheson,et al.  Understanding knowledge , 2013 .

[59]  Fred J. Heemstra,et al.  Senior executives' use of information technology , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[60]  S. M. Arnsten.  Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[61]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[62]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[63]  Jean-Paul A. Barthès,et al.  Knowledge Management , 1994, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[64]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[65]  William R. King,et al.  Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system , 2008 .

[66]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[67]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Are norms enough? The role of collaborative norms in promoting organizational knowledge seeking , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[69]  B. Fisher.  Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[70]  Cheng-Kiang Farn,et al.  Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Uday R. Kulkarni,et al.  A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the design of process‐oriented knowledge management system for fourth generation R&D , 2007 .

[73]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  An organizational memory information systems success model: an extension of DeLone and McLean's I/S success model , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[75]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[76]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[77]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[78]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[79]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[81]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[82]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[83]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .