Intergenerational Hybrids: Spillbacks, Spillforwards, and Adapting to Technology Discontinuities
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Teece. Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .
[2] S. Winter,et al. Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities , 2001 .
[3] James M. Utterback,et al. Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .
[4] I. Cockburn,et al. Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .
[5] S. Winter,et al. An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .
[6] R. Katila,et al. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .
[7] Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al. Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .
[8] E. Duflo,et al. How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .
[9] Mary Tripsas. Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .
[10] M. Tushman,et al. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .
[11] R. Garud,et al. Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .
[12] K. Eisenhardt,et al. The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .
[13] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. Complementary Assets as Pipes and Prisms: Innovation Incentives and Trajectory Choices , 2012 .
[14] Daniel A. Levinthal. The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .
[15] James M. Utterback,et al. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .
[16] R. Garud,et al. TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .
[17] Ron Adner,et al. Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .
[18] Clark G. Gilbert,et al. Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[19] F. Knight. The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .
[20] C. Gersick. REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .
[21] Gary P. Pisano,et al. Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology , 1996 .
[22] David A. Hounshell,et al. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry , 2000 .
[23] Mary J. Benner,et al. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .
[24] James A. Kahn. Gasoline Prices and the Used Automobile Market: A Rational Expectations Asset Price Approach , 1986 .
[25] Clayton M. Christensen. EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART II: ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .
[26] J. Eggers. Competing Technologies and Industry Evolution: The Benefits of Making Mistakes in the Flat Panel Display Industry , 2012 .
[27] B. Kogut,et al. Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .
[28] R. Garud,et al. Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications , 2009 .
[29] David H. Hsu,et al. Knowledge Brokering and Organizational Innovation: Founder Imprinting Effects , 2014, Organ. Sci..
[30] Kim B. Clark,et al. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .
[31] M. Tushman,et al. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .
[32] K. Pavitt,et al. Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .
[33] Anand Swaminathan,et al. Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .
[34] R. Katila,et al. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .
[35] Mary J. Benner. Dynamic or Static Capabilities? Process Management Practices and Response to Technological Change† , 2009 .
[36] Fabrice Cavarretta,et al. Who Changes Course? The Role of Domain Knowledge and Novel Framing in Making Technology Changes , 2012 .
[37] Mary Tripsas,et al. Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability: Evidence from the Typesetter Industry , 1997 .
[38] O. Sorenson,et al. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .
[39] R. Rosenbloom. Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era , 2000 .
[40] J. P. Eggers,et al. Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[41] Clayton M. Christensen. The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Business , 2011 .
[42] Clayton M. Christensen. EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .
[43] R. Henderson. Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .
[44] Kim B. Clark,et al. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .
[45] Clayton M. Christensen,et al. CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .
[46] Daniel C. Snow,et al. 'Old' Technology Responses to 'New' Technology Threats: Demand Heterogeneity and Graceful Technology Retreats , 2009 .
[47] C. Gilbert. Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .
[48] Constance E. Helfat,et al. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .
[49] M. Trajtenberg. A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .
[50] R. Katila,et al. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .
[51] Daniel C. Snow,et al. BoldR: A New Strategy for Old Technologies , 2010 .
[52] R. Henderson,et al. Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology , 2003 .
[53] Giovanni Gavetti,et al. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .
[54] Lee Fleming,et al. Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..
[55] B. Kogut,et al. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .
[56] D. Teece. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .
[57] R. Grant,et al. Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .
[58] James M. Utterback,et al. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .
[59] Kim B. Clark,et al. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .
[60] J. Eggers. Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry: Competing Technologies and Industry Evolution , 2014 .
[61] J. Eggers,et al. Falling Flat , 2012 .
[62] Mary Tripsas,et al. Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[63] Gino Cattani,et al. Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance: A Study on the Evolution of Fiber Optics, 1970–1995 , 2005, Organ. Sci..
[64] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[65] Anne S. Miner,et al. Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .
[66] Clayton M. Christensen,et al. Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .
[67] Mary J. Benner,et al. Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .
[68] Barry L. Bayus,et al. The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[69] M. Lourdes Sosa,et al. Application-Specific R&D Capabilities and the Advantage of Incumbents: Evidence from the Anticancer Drug Market , 2009, Manag. Sci..
[70] M. Lourdes Sosa,et al. From Old Competence Destruction to New Competence Access: Evidence from the Comparison of Two Discontinuities in Anticancer Drug Discovery , 2011 .
[71] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .
[72] R. Henderson. Of life cycles real and imaginary : the unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography , 1995 .
[73] Bronwyn H Hall,et al. Market value and patent citations , 2005 .
[74] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .
[75] Jing Dong,et al. Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[76] Nathan R. Furr,et al. Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2015 .
[77] Mary Tripsas,et al. 1 Technology and Industry Evolution , 2008 .
[78] Kim B. Clark,et al. The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .
[79] Mary J. Benner. Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony , 2010, Organ. Sci..
[80] Ron Adner,et al. Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves , 2016 .