Intergenerational Hybrids: Spillbacks, Spillforwards, and Adapting to Technology Discontinuities

During technological discontinuities, incumbents frequently develop hybrids of competing technical generations. Although some prior work implies that such intergenerational hybrids may be the result of organizational dysfunction, we propose that in some cases hybrids may be sophisticated learning tools that shape organizational adaptation to a technological discontinuity. In this paper, we suggest two mechanisms through which intergenerational hybrids may affect organizational adaptation: spillbacks and spillforwards. In an empirical test among the population of automobile carburetor manufacturers during a technological discontinuity, we observe that organizations developing intergenerational hybrids capture spillback benefits-knowledge spillovers from an emerging technology generation to the current generation. Furthermore, we find that these same organizations also capture spillforwards-spillover benefits from developing higher-performing intergenerational hybrids that improve their product performance in the future technology generation. These results suggest that intergenerational hybrids may be stepping-stones for organizations to learn about and adapt to technology discontinuities.

[1]  D. Teece Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities , 2001 .

[3]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[4]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[5]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[6]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[7]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .

[8]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[9]  Mary Tripsas Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[10]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[11]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Complementary Assets as Pipes and Prisms: Innovation Incentives and Trajectory Choices , 2012 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .

[15]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[16]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[17]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[18]  Clark G. Gilbert,et al.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[19]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[20]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[21]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology , 1996 .

[22]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry , 2000 .

[23]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[24]  James A. Kahn Gasoline Prices and the Used Automobile Market: A Rational Expectations Asset Price Approach , 1986 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART II: ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[26]  J. Eggers Competing Technologies and Industry Evolution: The Benefits of Making Mistakes in the Flat Panel Display Industry , 2012 .

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[28]  R. Garud,et al.  Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications , 2009 .

[29]  David H. Hsu,et al.  Knowledge Brokering and Organizational Innovation: Founder Imprinting Effects , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[31]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[32]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[33]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .

[34]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[35]  Mary J. Benner Dynamic or Static Capabilities? Process Management Practices and Response to Technological Change† , 2009 .

[36]  Fabrice Cavarretta,et al.  Who Changes Course? The Role of Domain Knowledge and Novel Framing in Making Technology Changes , 2012 .

[37]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability: Evidence from the Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[38]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[39]  R. Rosenbloom Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era , 2000 .

[40]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Business , 2011 .

[42]  Clayton M. Christensen EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[43]  R. Henderson Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[44]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[45]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[46]  Daniel C. Snow,et al.  'Old' Technology Responses to 'New' Technology Threats: Demand Heterogeneity and Graceful Technology Retreats , 2009 .

[47]  C. Gilbert Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[48]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[49]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[50]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[51]  Daniel C. Snow,et al.  BoldR: A New Strategy for Old Technologies , 2010 .

[52]  R. Henderson,et al.  Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology , 2003 .

[53]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[54]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[55]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[56]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[57]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[58]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[59]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[60]  J. Eggers Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry: Competing Technologies and Industry Evolution , 2014 .

[61]  J. Eggers,et al.  Falling Flat , 2012 .

[62]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Gino Cattani,et al.  Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance: A Study on the Evolution of Fiber Optics, 1970–1995 , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[66]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[67]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[68]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[69]  M. Lourdes Sosa,et al.  Application-Specific R&D Capabilities and the Advantage of Incumbents: Evidence from the Anticancer Drug Market , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[70]  M. Lourdes Sosa,et al.  From Old Competence Destruction to New Competence Access: Evidence from the Comparison of Two Discontinuities in Anticancer Drug Discovery , 2011 .

[71]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[72]  R. Henderson Of life cycles real and imaginary : the unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography , 1995 .

[73]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[74]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[75]  Jing Dong,et al.  Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[76]  Nathan R. Furr,et al.  Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2015 .

[77]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  1 Technology and Industry Evolution , 2008 .

[78]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[79]  Mary J. Benner Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Ron Adner,et al.  Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves , 2016 .