Talking to Score: Impression Management in L2 Oral Assessment and the Co-Construction of a Test Discourse Genre

In recent years, the emphasis in second language (L2) oral proficiency assessment has shifted from linguistic accuracy to discourse strategies such as the ability to initiate, respond, and negotiate meaning. This has resulted in a growing interest in the discourse analysis of students' performance in different oral proficiency assessment formats. The study reported in this article represents an attempt to investigate students' discourse performance in L2 oral proficiency assessments conducted in the form of peer group interactions in Hong Kong. Forty-three female Hong Kong secondary students were involved. Findings from a qualitative discourse analysis of the students' interaction data supplemented with data from interviews and a questionnaire reveal the emergence of a test-task specific genre featuring recurrent frames of talk for task management, content delivery, and response giving. These frames were characterized by discourse features that seem to be ritualized, contrived, and colluded. Such interaction practices suggest a strong desire on the part of the students to maintain the impression of being effective interlocutors for scoring purposes rather than for authentic communication. Implications for test construct validity and the impact on the students' L2 oral proficiency development are discussed.

[1]  Glenn Fulcher,et al.  Tests of Oral Performance: The Need for Data-based Criteria. , 1987 .

[2]  Liz Hamp-Lyons,et al.  Topic Negotiation in Peer Group Oral Assessment Situations: A Conversation Analytic Approach , 2009 .

[3]  Paul Black,et al.  Assessment for Learning in the Classroom , 2004 .

[4]  J. O. Urmson,et al.  How to Do Things with Words@@@The William James Lectures , 1963 .

[5]  Douglas Barnes,et al.  Communication and Learning Revisited , 2021 .

[6]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[7]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .

[8]  C. Davison.  Views From the Chalkface: English Language School-Based Assessment in Hong Kong , 2007 .

[9]  J. Gee.  Opportunity to Learn: A language-based perspective on assessment , 2003 .

[10]  M. Coulthard,et al.  Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis , 1992 .

[11]  Richard Young,et al.  13. DISCOURSE APPROACHES TO ORAL LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT , 2002, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[12]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: an introduction to an analytic framework , 1999 .

[13]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  The Structural Organization of a Language Interview: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. , 1992 .

[14]  James L. Heap.  Conversation Analysis Methods in Researching Language and Education , 1997 .

[15]  Světla Čmejrková,et al.  Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Distinctive Turn-Taking Systems , 1998 .

[16]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[17]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[18]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[19]  M. Swain,et al.  THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING , 1980 .

[20]  Suresh Canagarajah,et al.  Changing Communicative Needs, Revised Assessment Objectives: Testing English as an International Language , 2006 .

[21]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[22]  Andrea Tyler,et al.  Re-analyzing the OPI: How Much Does It Look Like Natural Conversation? , 1998 .

[23]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[24]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[25]  Wan Shun Eva Lam.  L2 Literacy and the Design of the Self: A Case Study of a Teenager Writing on the Internet , 2000 .

[26]  John Flowerdew,et al.  Genre Analysis of Editorial Letters to International Journal Contributors , 2002 .

[27]  Elana Shohamy.  Discourse Analysis In Language Testing , 1990, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[28]  Tim McNamara,et al.  Discourse and Assessment. , 2002 .

[29]  Lianzhen He,et al.  A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion , 2006 .

[30]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[31]  Tim McNamara,et al.  12. DISCOURSE AND ASSESSMENT , 2002, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[32]  R. Young,et al.  Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews , 1995 .

[33]  Maria Egbert.  Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: A comparison with natural conversation. , 1998 .

[34]  Caryl Emerson,et al.  The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin , 1982 .

[35]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[36]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[37]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[38]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests , 2002 .

[39]  Adam Jaworski,et al.  The Discourse Reader , 2006 .

[40]  T. Pica.  Second-language Acquisition, Social Interaction, and the Classroom. , 1987 .

[41]  H. Riggenbach,et al.  Evaluating Learner Interactional Skills: Conversation at the Micro Level , 1998 .

[42]  R. McDermott,et al.  On the necessity of collusion in conversation , 1983 .