Feedback Provision in Mentoring Conversation--Differing Mentor and Student Perceptions.

Diverging perceptions between a mentor and a mentee on the nature and content of feedback given in mentoring conversations may have a profound impact on the mentee’s learning from conversation. This study gauges whether approaches to mentoring relate to establishing congruency in perceptions on provided feedback. The aim of this research is to study differences in mentor and student perceptions of feedback provided during mentoring sessions. For that purpose, this study compares typical mentoring approaches across different settings. Sixty eight students (37 Teaching Assistant (TA) students in secondary vocational education and 31 Teacher Education (TE) students in Higher Education) and their mentors participated in this study. Mentoring conversations on teaching internships of these students were analyzed. A questionnaire instrument was used to gauge 1) acceptance of feedback from mentoring as well as 2) following recommendations after feedback provision. Approaches to mentors’ conversation styles were identified with an observation instrument categorizing mentoring into four types. TA students predominantly recognized their mentor’ s approach as having a Imperator (supervising) style, while the TE students identified it as an Initiator (engaging style). As a result, TA students expressed a higher degree of acceptance of feedback, as compared to TE students. Differences in perception between students and their mentors on feedback provision were found to be significant. Our findings point to the importance of mentoring approach as it impinges on the feedback acceptance in mentoring  conversations.

[1]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert , 2004 .

[2]  Harm Tillema,et al.  Assessment for Learning to Teach , 2009 .

[3]  Kari Smith,et al.  Portfolio appraisal: In search of criteria , 2007 .

[4]  Tcm Theo Bergen,et al.  Exploring a two-dimensional model of mentor teacher roles in mentoring dialogues , 2011 .

[5]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[6]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[7]  D. Sadler.  Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal , 2010 .

[8]  D. Wiliam.  What Is Assessment for Learning , 2011 .

[9]  H. Tillema,et al.  Facing dilemmas: teacher-educators’ ways of constructing a pedagogy of teacher education , 2005 .

[10]  E. Munthe.  Portfolios for professional development: a research journey , 2010 .

[11]  D. Carless.  Differing perceptions in the feedback process , 2006 .

[12]  Harm Tillema,et al.  Studying Studies on Teacher Reflection and Action: An Appraisal of Research Contributions. , 2006 .

[13]  Kathleen T. Brinko.  The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching: What Is Effective?. , 1993 .

[14]  H. Tillema,et al.  Mentoring Conversations and Student Teacher Learning , 2015 .

[15]  Pierre Roberge,et al.  Coaching and Mentoring: Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[16]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[17]  Mien Segers,et al.  Validation of Assessment for Learning Questionnaires for teachers and students. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  V. Shute.  Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[19]  Light Greg,et al.  Learning and teaching in higher education , 2001 .

[20]  Scott Fleming,et al.  Agreement in Student Performance in Assessment , 2004 .

[21]  M. Carter.  Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement , 2009 .

[22]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.