Integrated Investigation of Dynamic Drainage Volume and Inflow Performance Relationship (Transient IPR) to Optimize Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Tight/Shale Formations

This study presents an integrated approach to evaluate the efficiency of fracturing stimulation and predict well production performance. As the pressure disturbance propagates throughout the reservoir during long-time transient flow regimes, it will shape an expanding drainage volume. A macroscopic “compressible tank model (CTM)” using weak (integral) form of mass balance equation is derived to relate dynamic drainage volume (DDV) and average reservoir pressure to production history in extremely shale reservoirs. Fluids and rock compressibility, desorption parameters (for shale or coal gas), and production rates control the speed at which the boundaries advance. After the changes of average reservoir pressure within the expanding drainage volume are obtained, a new empirical inflow performance relationship (transient IPR) correlation is proposed to describe well performance during long transient flow periods in shale reservoirs. This new empirical correlation shows better match performance with field data than that of conventional Vogel-type IPR curves. The integrated approach of both CTM model and transient IPR correlation is used to determine and predict the optimal fracturing spacing and the size of horizontal section for few wells from one of shale oil plays in U.S. The results suggest the existence of optimal fracture spacing and horizontal well length for multistage fractured horizontal wells in shale oil reservoirs. In practice, this paper not only provides an insight in understanding the long transient flow production characteristics of shale reservoirs using concept of expanding drainage volume. Neither methods require comprehensive inputs for the strong form (differential) nor any prior knowledge about the sophisticated shale reservoir features (shape, size, etc.), the ultimate drainage volume, the ultimate recovery, optimal fracture spacing, and the length of horizontal section for each well can also be easily obtained by this new integrated analytical method.

[1]  M. Tabatabaei,et al.  Generalized inflow performance relationships for horizontal gas wells , 2010 .

[2]  Jay Alan Rushing,et al.  A Production-Based Method for Direct Estimation of Gas-in-Place and Reserves , 2005 .

[3]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Unconventional gas reservoir evaluation: What do we have to consider? , 2012 .

[4]  Bush,et al.  Top-Down Reservoir Modelling , 2004 .

[5]  M. Wiggins,et al.  A Two-Phase IPR for Horizontal Oil Wells , 2005 .

[6]  David A. Wood,et al.  Production analysis and performance forecasting for natural gas reservoirs: Theory and practice (2011–2015) , 2015 .

[7]  Mohan Kelkar,et al.  Infill-Drilling Potential in Tight Gas Reservoirs , 2013 .

[8]  Ognjen Grujic,et al.  Modeling, History Matching, Forecasting and Analysis of Shale Reservoirs Performance Using Artificial Intelligence , 2011 .

[9]  Lei Wang,et al.  Type Curves Analysis for Asymmetrically Fractured Wells , 2014 .

[10]  John P. Seidle Coal Well Decline Behavior and Drainage Areas: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[11]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume , 2010 .

[12]  Antonin Settari,et al.  A Pore Scale Gas Flow Model for Shale Gas Reservoir , 2012 .

[13]  Bin Yuan,et al.  Stimulation and hydraulic fracturing technology in natural gas reservoirs: Theory and case studies (2012–2015) , 2015 .

[14]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  A Better Way To Forecast Production From Unconventional Gas Wells , 2010 .

[15]  Dilhan Ilk,et al.  Exponential vs. Hyperbolic Decline in Tight Gas Sands: Understanding the Origin and Implications for Reserve Estimates Using Arps' Decline Curves , 2008 .

[16]  Paul Jeffrey Brown,et al.  Evaluation of Unconventional Resource Plays , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Berry Smith,et al.  Horizontal Well Completion, Stimulation Optimization, and Risk Mitigation , 2009 .

[18]  Hong-quan Zhang,et al.  Generalized Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) for Horizontal Wells , 2013 .

[19]  John P. Spivey,et al.  Pressure Transient Testing , 2003 .

[20]  M. Wiggins Generalized inflow performance relationships for three-phase flow , 1994 .

[21]  Turgay Ertekin,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL PERFORMANCE IN THE MARCELLUS SHALE GAS RESERVOIRS , 2013 .

[22]  Yuliang Su,et al.  A new analytical multi-linear solution for gas flow toward fractured horizontal wells with different fracture intensity , 2015 .

[23]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Modeling of Fluid Transfer From Shale Matrix to Fracture Network , 2010 .

[24]  Jay Alan Rushing,et al.  Applicability of the Arps Rate-Time Relationships for Evaluating Decline Behavior and Ultimate Gas Recovery of Coalbed Methane Wells , 2008 .

[25]  Bin Yuan,et al.  Applying macroscopic material balance to evaluate interplay between dynamic drainage volume and well performance in tight formations , 2015 .

[26]  M. Economides,et al.  Inflow Performance Relationships of Horizontal and Multibranched Wells in a Solution- Gas-Drive Reservoir , 1998 .

[27]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  A Hierarchical Streamline-Assisted History Matching Approach With Global and Local Parameter Updates , 2011 .

[28]  J. V. Vogel,et al.  Inflow Performance Relationships for Solution-Gas Drive Wells , 1968 .

[29]  Wang Wendong,et al.  Investigation of hydraulic fracture optimization in on Infill well in low permeability reservoirs , 2014 .

[30]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Review of theory and best practices , 2013 .

[31]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Improved characterization and performance prediction of shale gas wells by integrating stimulated reservoir volume and dynamic production data , 2015 .

[32]  Tayfun Babadagli,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Complex Fracture Network Development by Hydraulic Fracturing in Naturally Fractured Ultratight Formations , 2014 .

[33]  F. Javadpour Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[34]  Yueming Cheng,et al.  A New Approach for Reliable Estimation of Hydraulic Fracture Properties Using Elliptical Flow Data in Tight Gas Wells , 2009 .

[35]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Integration of microseismic and other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis: A tight gas study , 2011 .

[36]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Single-Phase Inflow Performance Relationship for Horizontal, Pinnate-Branch Horizontal, and Radial-Branch Wells , 2013 .

[37]  J. J. Arps Analysis of Decline Curves , 1945 .

[38]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[39]  George E. King,et al.  Thirty Years of Gas Shale Fracturing: What Have We Learned? , 2010 .

[40]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Effect of Discontinuous Microfractures on Ultratight Matrix Permeability of a Dual-Porosity Medium , 2012 .