Reducing Carbon-Based Energy Consumption through Changes in Household Behavior

Actions by individuals and households to reduce carbon-based energy consumption have the potential to change the picture of U.S. energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in the near term. To tap this potential, however, energy policies and programs need to replace outmoded assumptions about what drives human behavior; they must integrate insights from the behavioral and social sciences with those from engineering and economics. This integrated approach has thus far only occasionally been implemented. This essay summarizes knowledge from the social sciences and from highly successful energy programs to show what the potential is and how it can be achieved.

[1]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Simple and Painless? The Limitations of Spillover in Environmental Campaigning , 2009 .

[2]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[3]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Design principles for carbon emissions reduction programs. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  The impact of ‘Cash for Clunkers’ on greenhouse gas emissions: a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[5]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation , 1986 .

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Perception and expectation of climate change: Precondition for economic and technological adaptation. , 1997 .

[8]  D. Lineweber,et al.  Understanding Residential Customer Support for – and Opposition to – Smart Grid Investments , 2011 .

[9]  Richard York,et al.  Ecological Paradoxes: William Stanley Jevons and the Paperless Office , 2006 .

[10]  A. Szász.  Shopping Our Way to Safety: How We Changed from Protecting the Environment to Protecting Ourselves , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Implementing the Behavioral Wedge: Designing and Adopting Effective Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs , 2010 .

[12]  R. Cialdini.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .

[13]  Daniel Pichert,et al.  Green defaults : Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour , 2008 .

[14]  Eli Kintisch.  Out of site. , 2010, Science.

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Shwom.  A middle range theorization of energy politics: the struggle for energy efficient appliances , 2011 .

[17]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  Standards: Recipes for Reality , 2011 .

[18]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[19]  E. Weber.  Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[20]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  B. Frostell,et al.  Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: Potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation , 2011 .

[22]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .

[23]  A. Cavoukian,et al.  SmartPrivacy for the Smart Grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bridging Environmental Science with Environmental Policy: Plasticity of Population, Affluence, and Technology , 2002 .

[25]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Nudge Your Customers Toward Better Choices , 2008 .

[26]  Michael Duncan,et al.  The Art of Influence. , 2007 .

[27]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Chapter 6 do consumers know "what works" in energy conservation? , 1985 .

[28]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[29]  K. Tsagarakis,et al.  Effective education for energy efficiency , 2008 .

[30]  Michael K. Price,et al.  The Persistence of Treatment Effects with Norm-Based Policy Instruments: Evidence from a Randomized Environmental Policy Experiment , 2011 .

[31]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[32]  P. Stern.  Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[33]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[34]  Daniel G Goldstein,et al.  Partitioning Default Effects: Why People Choose Not to Choose , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[35]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices , 2012 .

[37]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Psychology and Behavioral Economics Lessons for the Design of a Green Growth Strategy , 2012 .