Psychosocial Outcomes of Telemedicine Case Management for Elderly Patients With Diabetes

Diabetes case management (DCM) may improve medical outcomes (1,2). Case managers coordinate care and often provide a mix of interventions, e.g., telephone outreach, education, reminders. However, the efficacy of DCM is unclear. Three systematic reviews lend only limited support for the efficacy of DCM for improving glycemic control but none for lipid, weight, or blood pressure benefits (3–5). DCM studies typically target biomedical outcomes and ignore potential psychosocial effects. Yet, psychosocial variables (e.g., depression, anxiety, social support) relate to hyperglycemia, complications, adherence, and quality of life (6–11). Thus, a positive impact of DCM on these factors is important. Two studies did assess psychosocial outcomes of DCM and found improved self-efficacy and satisfaction (cluster visit) (12) and quality of life (dietitian-led DCM group) (13). Because barriers (e.g., distance, weather) limit DCM access, telemedicine can be used. A review of telemedicine versus face-to-face trials concluded that, while feasible and acceptable, there is little evidence that telemedicine has clinical benefits (14). Our team published results of a trial of telemedicine DCM versus usual care for elderly diabetic patients (15). The intervention resulted in significant improvements in glycemic control, blood pressure, and total and LDL cholesterol (16). The purpose of the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project, funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine with a diverse, medically underserved, elderly diabetic sample. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the IDEATel intervention on secondary psychosocial outcomes. A detailed description of the IDEATel study design has been previously reported (15,16). Medicare recipients were recruited if they were aged ≥55 years, diagnosed with diabetes, and without moderate/severe impairments or comorbidities. Research nurses blinded to the groups …

[1]  Jennifer Spaeth,et al.  Task Force on Community Preventive Services , 2009 .

[2]  James F. Konopack,et al.  Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: Influence of health status and self-efficacy , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[3]  Justin Starren,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  S. Valente,et al.  Nurse Care Coordination for Diabetes: A Literature Review and Synthesis , 2005, Journal of nursing care quality.

[5]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[6]  V. Sousa,et al.  Relationships among self-care agency, self-efficacy, self-care, and glycemic control. , 2005, Research and theory for nursing practice.

[7]  C. Westley Diabetes care project at University Medical Associates. , 2005, Lippincott's case management : managing the process of patient care.

[8]  V. Sousa,et al.  Testing a Conceptual Framework for Diabetes Self-Care Management , 2004, Research and Theory for Nursing Practice.

[9]  Wayne Katon,et al.  Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[10]  Mark R Conaway,et al.  Translating lifestyle intervention to practice in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: Improving Control with Activity and Nutrition (ICAN) study. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[11]  Wayne Katon,et al.  The Effectiveness of Depression Care Management on Diabetes-Related Outcomes in Older Patients , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  R. Hayward,et al.  Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  W. Katon,et al.  Behavioral and clinical factors associated with depression among individuals with diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[14]  R. Weinstock,et al.  A comparison of health-related quality of life of elderly and younger insulin-treated adults with diabetes. , 2003, Age and ageing.

[15]  K. Freedland,et al.  Association of Depression and Diabetes Complications: A Meta-Analysis , 2001, Psychosomatic medicine.

[16]  C. Urquhart,et al.  Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. , 2000, Nursing times.

[17]  R. Carney,et al.  Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[18]  J. Selby,et al.  Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[19]  International collaborative research on management self-efficacy in diabetes mellitus. , 1996 .

[20]  F J Snoek,et al.  Development of a Type 2 Diabetes Symptom Checklist: a Measure of Symptom Severity , 1994, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[21]  D. Patrick,et al.  Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. , 1993, Journal of health and social behavior.

[22]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[23]  R. Glasgow,et al.  psychosocial Predictors of Self-Care Behaviors (Compliance) and Glycemic Control in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 1986, Diabetes Care.

[24]  J. Teresi,et al.  The SHORT-CARE: an efficient instrument for the assessment of depression, dementia and disability. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.